Hagel doesn’t understand the defense budget
Senator Lindsey Graham’s skewering yesterday of former senator and prospective defense secretary Chuck Hagel over the latter’s comments about the “Jewish lobby” and its ability to “intimidate” members of Congress will certainly go down in the history of confirmation hearings as a Top Ten moment. But somewhat obscured by that exchange was Senator Graham’s previous question to Hagel about the size of the defense budget relative to the country’s GDP. Hagel, clearly guessing, answered: “Well, we are, I think, it is probably 5% in that area.” Well, actually, it’s not Mr. Hagel. The national defense budget is 4% of GDP, with war funding included, and the base defense budget is only 3.4%. No wonder Chuck Hagel thinks, as he is quoted as saying, the Defense Department is “bloated.”
But of course, Hagel was saying the department was bloated after the Obama administration had already cut almost $400 billion from current and planned defense expenditures and in the face of the hundreds of billions more in proposed cuts by the 2011 Budget Control Act. And he was doing so in spite of the current defense secretary, Leon Panetta, arguing that such additional cuts would be disastrous to US security.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
OldEnglish on February 3, 2013 at 11:01 AM
Well, he would if those darned Jewish accountants didn’t make it so confusing.
steebo77 on February 3, 2013 at 11:04 AM
Hagel doesn’t know his defense budget from a hole in the ground.
Gingotts on February 3, 2013 at 11:05 AM
The guy’s not real bright and not real sharp. Yet will that matter to the Democratic Party? Par for the course.
CW on February 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM
Well neither does the President or any one else in his administration. For that matter non of them understand anything with regard to the budget defense or otherwise…
Tilly on February 3, 2013 at 11:33 AM
Obama needs a fall guy (Preferably one who was “once a Republican”) to take the heat when sequestration hits and women on the front line start coming home in body bags.
Panetta will be long forgotten by then. Even if it was only weeks earlier.
Jack Deth on February 3, 2013 at 11:49 AM
What’s the difference?
vityas on February 3, 2013 at 12:44 PM
The note in the margins that said “bet you STILL can’t defund us, ha ha ha!” threw his pea-sized brain for a loop.
MelonCollie on February 3, 2013 at 1:12 PM
Bagel probably has a Stanley Kubrick take on military spending – that it’s an endless shopping spree at F.A.O.Schwartz for spoiled generals and admirals. But if the defense budget is anything like just about every other government budget, it will soon be overwhelmed by pension costs and other benefits. It’s hard to picture Bagel telling vets to tighten their belts.
Seth Halpern on February 3, 2013 at 1:46 PM
FACE IT:
Hagel was selected precisely because the Obamacrats know he will be a totally incompetent and ineffective Defense Secretary. Their goal is to destroy our military.
landlines on February 3, 2013 at 2:03 PM