<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Containing Hagel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:52:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucano</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263196</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:59 AM

The consensus of our betters in the media is that he will breeze by 51-49.

Cindy Munford on February 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM

Always loved your very dry sense of humor .
Thanks for the effort .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:59 AM</p>
<p>The consensus of our betters in the media is that he will breeze by 51-49.</p>
<p>Cindy Munford on February 2, 2013 at 12:01 PM</p>
<p>Always loved your very dry sense of humor .<br />
Thanks for the effort .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Munford</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263181</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Munford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:59 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The consensus of our betters in the media is that he will breeze by 51-49.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:59 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>The consensus of our betters in the media is that he will breeze by 51-49.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucano</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263176</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:36 AM

Mission accomplished but then they are actually going to give him the job. I have to assume they think it hearings made Republicans look bad. That’s a lot of spin.

Cindy Munford on February 2, 2013 at 11:39 AM

How could anyone vote to confirm that
dunce ?
Me thinks we should start taking names !
Oh......wait ......we already did that .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:36 AM</p>
<p>Mission accomplished but then they are actually going to give him the job. I have to assume they think it hearings made Republicans look bad. That’s a lot of spin.</p>
<p>Cindy Munford on February 2, 2013 at 11:39 AM</p>
<p>How could anyone vote to confirm that<br />
dunce ?<br />
Me thinks we should start taking names !<br />
Oh&#8230;&#8230;wait &#8230;&#8230;we already did that .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Munford</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263170</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Munford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Paul-Cincy on February 2, 2013 at 11:39 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think it is exhausting, they are lucky in their very compliant press that has no intention of pointing out these things or even challenging them on inconsistencies. They don&#039;t even bother to check historical facts in his speeches.  At this point the only thing I can hope for is that they give themselves enough rope to hang with, but I am not the least bit confident it will happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Paul-Cincy on February 2, 2013 at 11:39 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it is exhausting, they are lucky in their very compliant press that has no intention of pointing out these things or even challenging them on inconsistencies. They don&#8217;t even bother to check historical facts in his speeches.  At this point the only thing I can hope for is that they give themselves enough rope to hang with, but I am not the least bit confident it will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul-Cincy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263139</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul-Cincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;During an appearance on Al Jazeera in 2009, a caller asked him about “the perception and the reality” that America is “the world’s bully” — and Hagel told viewers that he agreed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Obama admin spends most of its energy covering up what it really believes. It must be exhausting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>During an appearance on Al Jazeera in 2009, a caller asked him about “the perception and the reality” that America is “the world’s bully” — and Hagel told viewers that he agreed.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Obama admin spends most of its energy covering up what it really believes. It must be exhausting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Munford</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263140</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Munford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:36 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mission accomplished but then they are actually going to give him the job.  I have to assume they think it hearings made Republicans look bad. That&#039;s a lot of spin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:36 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Mission accomplished but then they are actually going to give him the job.  I have to assume they think it hearings made Republicans look bad. That&#8217;s a lot of spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Munford</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263136</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Munford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry Lucano, I have been trying to find out the name or the video from last night but I am not having any luck.  User error.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Lucano, I have been trying to find out the name or the video from last night but I am not having any luck.  User error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucano</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263134</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cindy Munford 
Maybe they just put Hagel up there to make
a horses butt out of him .
Unbelievable !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy Munford<br />
Maybe they just put Hagel up there to make<br />
a horses butt out of him .<br />
Unbelievable !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Munford</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263115</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Munford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:10 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They seem to think that Hagel will get the job but this guy will be doing the work.  There is something really really odd about this move by the administration.  I am sure all sorts of people are put into high profile jobs while doing none of the actual work but usually the figure head has something to recommend them. Unless I am missing something (not impossible) the only thing Hagel seems to have going for him is the &#039;R&#039; after his name. I guess the damage to be done will be under guise of bipartisanship.  Interesting that they don&#039;t even care that Hagel comes off as a bumbling stooge willing to say and do anything to get the job.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 11:10 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>They seem to think that Hagel will get the job but this guy will be doing the work.  There is something really really odd about this move by the administration.  I am sure all sorts of people are put into high profile jobs while doing none of the actual work but usually the figure head has something to recommend them. Unless I am missing something (not impossible) the only thing Hagel seems to have going for him is the &#8216;R&#8217; after his name. I guess the damage to be done will be under guise of bipartisanship.  Interesting that they don&#8217;t even care that Hagel comes off as a bumbling stooge willing to say and do anything to get the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucano</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/02/containing-hagel/comment-page-1/#comment-2263097</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=241168#comment-2263097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 10:52 AM

On Special Report last night they mentioned an Under Secretary of Defense who would probably be running the show and who probably should be a bit p.o.’d over the nomination of Hagel.

Cindy Munford on February 2, 2013 at 10:59 AM

Will they still try to shoehorn in &quot; a name &quot; ?
Or just give the poor chump the job ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucano on February 2, 2013 at 10:52 AM</p>
<p>On Special Report last night they mentioned an Under Secretary of Defense who would probably be running the show and who probably should be a bit p.o.’d over the nomination of Hagel.</p>
<p>Cindy Munford on February 2, 2013 at 10:59 AM</p>
<p>Will they still try to shoehorn in &#8221; a name &#8221; ?<br />
Or just give the poor chump the job ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>