<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/01/what-if-stimulus-works-but-only-in-theory/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 01:00:41 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>What if stimulus works -- but only in theory?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Since the financial crisis hit, we have borrowed and spent $5.7 trillion, or 41% of 2008 GDP (7.8% of total GDP over the period).  That is an enormous sum.  Presumably, it has raised output somewhat higher than it otherwise would have been&amp;#8211;just as an accounting identity, it would almost have to&amp;#8211;and yet it has left us with unemployment in the range of 8%, and per-capita GDP that is still below the pre-crisis trend.  How much would have been needed to force that growth back up to trend?]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:20:10 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Allahpundit]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/2013/02/01/what-if-stimulus-works-but-only-in-theory-n99786</link></item></channel></rss>