Comments on: Please, Mr. President, not another “national conversation”

By: petefrt

petefrt — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 02:05:03 +0000

Hey Obama and your juvenile speech writers, take your sophomoric cliches and platitudes and stuff ‘em. We’re not the idiots you play us for.

By: viking01

viking01 — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:08:17 +0000

Please, Mr. President, keep that kneeling Steve Kroft concealed behind the lectern.

By: Mason

Mason — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:44:16 +0000

How about a national conversation about urban Black violence and its impact on such cities as Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, New York City and Atlanta all of which have been in the news repeatedly as well as during the past several days. This is killing America’s traditionally great cities although admittedly it may be too late to save them. Let’s talk about it.

By: Bishop

Bishop — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:22:33 +0000

Americans are having a national conversation about guns, that’s for certain, and they’re mostly saying “I’ll buy everything you have in the store.”

By: Difficultas_Est_Imperium

Difficultas_Est_Imperium — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:17:36 +0000

The essence of liberalism. No goals,accomplishments, or solutions. Just good feelings.

Bitter Clinger on February 1, 2013 at 7:08 PM

In the 70s the libs called it getting a “warm fuzzy”, they were and are Luddites.

By: Washington Nearsider

Washington Nearsider — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:08:38 +0000

But conversations with the goal of unlimited government – those are worth having.

By: Bitter Clinger

Bitter Clinger — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:08:00 +0000

A true conversation “doesn’t have a goal; it’s spontaneous,” says Daniel Menaker, the author of “A Good Talk: The Story and Skill of Conversation.” It’s about “making a human connection . . . you walk away feeling better.”

The essence of liberalism. No goals,accomplishments, or solutions. Just good feelings.