This NRA is a paper tiger
The 26 lives that were lost in a sleepy town in my state, and the NRA’s bizarre conduct in the wake of this tragedy, have caused people to begin to see the NRA’s true colors. It is an organization fueled by fear and funded by those who profit from America’s increasing fascination with military weaponry. And it is an organization with rapidly atrophying political muscle. When it comes to policy or politics, this simply isn’t your father’s NRA any longer…
This disconnect from responsible gun owners may explain why the NRA’s long-heralded political power is significantly waning. In the 2012 election, the group put nearly all its resources into defeating President Barack Obama and focused on states with high gun ownership rates, like Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania. It lost, badly, in nearly every state and race in which the group invested. In fact, the NRA won only 20 percent of the Senate races in which it spent money in 2012. That’s a pretty miserable success rate for an organization that was once feared by Democrats and Republicans alike.
The NRA’s downright disturbing behavior since the Newtown, Conn., massacre can possibly be explained as a desperate defense mechanism of an organization that has lost step with average gun owners and lost sway with the swing electorate. The NRA must know, deep in the recesses of its Virginia headquarters, that Newtown was a breaking point in America’s relationship with guns. Ours will always be a nation that values the private right of citizens to bear arms, but after the tragedy at Sandy Hook, we will no longer tolerate the ease with which dangerous people can possess and dispatch weapons of mass violence.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Didn’t the NRA just gain about half a million members?
Steven Den Beste on January 30, 2013 at 4:02 PM
wishcasting.
bannor on January 30, 2013 at 4:03 PM
Says the guy whose party is letting a good tragedy go to waste.
Daemonocracy on January 30, 2013 at 4:06 PM
Delusional. This is the type of blathering that comes from living within an echo chamber. Poke your head out into the real world and see that the vast majority of Americans agree that guns aren’t the problem.
ButterflyDragon on January 30, 2013 at 4:06 PM
1993 AWB sunset.
Heller.
McDonald.
State shall issue concealed carry greatly expanded over the past 20 years.
Illinois is no longer able to deny concealed carry.
2013 assault weapons ban DOA.
Yeah, that NRA is really ineffective. What a facile pseudo-thinker this Chris Murphy is.
JohnTant on January 30, 2013 at 4:06 PM
NRA does not have the clout it once had, there are better gun owner associations to belong to, but this is just bad journal-wishin
Sinatra_98 on January 30, 2013 at 4:06 PM
And Chris Murphy is a lying weasel.
Gun control has been kept off the radar by the Dems since their last debacle with it. Now that they’ve shown their stripes yet again, the 2nd amendment beast is going to smite them yet again.
jnelchef on January 30, 2013 at 4:06 PM
Well our home is a member of the nra and WE are not a ‘paper tiger’! Just keep up your slam on millions of American’s and we will not be one bit happy!
L
letget on January 30, 2013 at 4:07 PM
Yep, and the fact that you now have to fight through hundreds and thousands of people for a single crappy ProMag or a simple box of .22 LR, much less an AR or any other semi-auto rifle, shows that Americans have distanced themselves from guns.
Bishop on January 30, 2013 at 4:08 PM
Who can blame the libs for thinking they can ban guns? They’ve gotten away with so much over the last 4 years, I’m surprised they haven’t tried more.
portlandon on January 30, 2013 at 4:09 PM
Cuomo’s approval rating tanked almost overnight…in New York.
Hey, Dems, please go big against guns.
BuckeyeSam on January 30, 2013 at 4:12 PM
And Chris Murphy is full of sh!t. The NRA is fully aware that liberals destroy rights one piece at time. Today it’s assault weapons, tomorrow it’s handguns, next week it’s hunting rifles. This jerk is just pissed the NRA won’t allow itself to be divided.
antipc on January 30, 2013 at 4:14 PM
Politico is just progressive democrat garbage.
tom daschle concerned on January 30, 2013 at 4:15 PM
Keep telling yourself that, dude. 4.5 million NRA members and 80 million gun owners would tend to disagree. Can you hear all those Democrat politicians from red and purple states screaming for more gun control? Me neither.
RadClown on January 30, 2013 at 4:18 PM
The NRA’s bizarre conduct? Disturbing behavior?
supernova on January 30, 2013 at 4:18 PM
He’s from CT? Best to remain silent out of respect for his Absolute Moral Authority, lest one be accused of heckling.
Christien on January 30, 2013 at 4:18 PM
But… but…. 0bama shoots skeet or trap or something all the time at Camp David!
UltimateBob on January 30, 2013 at 4:19 PM
Liberal code for “Supports the Constitutional rights of Americans”.
Such things always scare the shazgooch out of lefties.
Bishop on January 30, 2013 at 4:21 PM
As someone who only sees an organization’s puissance in terms of partisan scorekeeping, it’s no surprise that apparatchniks like this guy underrate the NRA.
The NRA’s mission is not to elect Republicans, it’s to protect gun rights. The smoking remains of the gun grab coming down behind you are courtesy of Harry Reid.
HitNRun on January 30, 2013 at 4:22 PM
It’s beginning to dawn on smarter Dems that the political capital burn rate on this wishlist item isn’t worth the return. Of course, they’ll still shoot their eye out, to maintain appearances and cred.
Christien on January 30, 2013 at 4:28 PM
“fascination with military weaponry.”
more like fascination with century old technology… seriously… what has changed in the last say 50 years that is now causing all these problems?
Not the guns, they are the same… so presumably it must be something else.
If anything because of changing societal norms, and demographics there is less fascination with guns.
Dr. Shatterhand on January 30, 2013 at 4:35 PM
If poli-tick-co had a few good commies on staff they might be worth a click to read, but the bunch of Obama suck ups they got not so much as a click.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on January 30, 2013 at 4:35 PM
lol, this clown is from the Hartford area, which is nowhere near Newtown.
If he wants “sleepy” in that part of the state, he needs to go further north.
Murphy is also apparently bought and paid for by the unions, according to his waki page.
Del Dolemonte on January 30, 2013 at 4:37 PM
Perhaps since I live in CT and live in his former district, I have the authority.
Chris Murphy , you are a piece of sh!t.
I’ll never forget a “townhall meeting” he held a few years ago and he arrived with a busload of SEIU and AFSCME members to shout down anyone that had a question. If the questions did come out over the shouting, he refused to answer them.
He’s the epitome of what’s wrong with almost every person “serving” in DC.
CTSherman on January 30, 2013 at 4:39 PM
I know I won’t be having anything to do with that group. HeIIfire don’t you have to own guns to saddle up with that type.
Bmore on January 30, 2013 at 4:46 PM
…got a wake-up call. Defend yourself because no one else will.
Ronnie on January 30, 2013 at 4:47 PM
Levin is right in saying that Politico really is just another media tentacle of the Democrat party.
CorporatePiggy on January 30, 2013 at 5:02 PM
Why, yes. Disagreeing with the left is bizarre conduct and defending the Second Amendment is disturbing behavior. If they could, they would declare us ‘insane’ and put us in ‘mental institutions.’
RadClown on January 30, 2013 at 5:11 PM
A “paper tiger”?
Gun control is DOA in the senate, the NRA picked up about a million new members, and the American people bought enough firearms to equip both the Chinese and Indian armies – I wish I had more paper tigers on my side.
Rebar on January 30, 2013 at 6:03 PM
The 2nd identifies an inalienable right that can’t be infringed upon. Just like the 1st. Let’s try flipping his statement:
.
Yup. I agree. The press needs to be controlled. Not total control, mind you, all we’re asking for s balanced reporting and less bias. I think most people, 65% according to x poll, can support a more unbiased report. Congress needs to act now, we can’t wait any longer for reasonable media control, and the licensing/registration of law-abiding journalists that provide media content. Surely that’s rasonable to the paper tiger author?
AH_C on January 31, 2013 at 8:28 AM