<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The perils of bypassing Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/30/the-perils-of-bypassing-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/30/the-perils-of-bypassing-congress/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RadClown</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/30/the-perils-of-bypassing-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-2260288</link>
		<dc:creator>RadClown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=240665#comment-2260288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Or that a repub President doesn’t like the EO put in place by a dem. I can imagine any repub overriding any dem EOs unless outright illegal and even then I would have my doubts they would do it.

Dr. Frank Enstine on January 30, 2013 at 11:01 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Unfortunately, you&#039;re right. Additionally, a GOP President might not have the political balls to take the heat from cancelling some of these EOs. Based on past performance, that&#039;s a real possibility too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Or that a repub President doesn’t like the EO put in place by a dem. I can imagine any repub overriding any dem EOs unless outright illegal and even then I would have my doubts they would do it.</p>
<p>Dr. Frank Enstine on January 30, 2013 at 11:01 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately, you&#8217;re right. Additionally, a GOP President might not have the political balls to take the heat from cancelling some of these EOs. Based on past performance, that&#8217;s a real possibility too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GWB</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/30/the-perils-of-bypassing-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-2260280</link>
		<dc:creator>GWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=240665#comment-2260280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Pursuing climate change through the White House rather than Congress also runs the risk of being a slapdash approach to the problem rather than a comprehensive solution.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Because Congress &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; does &lt;strong&gt;anything&lt;/strong&gt; &quot;slapdash&quot; or that isn&#039;t &quot;&lt;em&gt;comprehensive&lt;/em&gt;&quot;. Riiiiiiiigggghhhhhtttttttt......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pursuing climate change through the White House rather than Congress also runs the risk of being a slapdash approach to the problem rather than a comprehensive solution.</p></blockquote>
<p>Because Congress <em>never</em> does <strong>anything</strong> &#8220;slapdash&#8221; or that isn&#8217;t &#8220;<em>comprehensive</em>&#8220;. Riiiiiiiigggghhhhhtttttttt&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Frank Enstine</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/30/the-perils-of-bypassing-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-2260278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Frank Enstine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=240665#comment-2260278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; That assumes of course that the next President isn’t a another Democrat.
RadClown on January 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Or that a repub President doesn&#039;t like the EO put in place by a dem. I can imagine any repub overriding any dem EOs unless outright illegal and even then I would have my doubts they would do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> That assumes of course that the next President isn’t a another Democrat.<br />
RadClown on January 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Or that a repub President doesn&#8217;t like the EO put in place by a dem. I can imagine any repub overriding any dem EOs unless outright illegal and even then I would have my doubts they would do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RadClown</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/30/the-perils-of-bypassing-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-2260275</link>
		<dc:creator>RadClown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=240665#comment-2260275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;“In general, an executive can move faster when it acts on its own, but the danger is that nine or 13 months later, they’re going to find that what they’ve done is struck down,” McConnell said. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s true, but those decisions would then have to be unwound and the executive branch can drag their feet on that too. By the time a new President comes in, many of these policies could already be entrenched in the system, making them politically and administratively harder to extract, with damage already done. That assumes of course that the next President isn&#039;t a another Democrat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“In general, an executive can move faster when it acts on its own, but the danger is that nine or 13 months later, they’re going to find that what they’ve done is struck down,” McConnell said. </p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s true, but those decisions would then have to be unwound and the executive branch can drag their feet on that too. By the time a new President comes in, many of these policies could already be entrenched in the system, making them politically and administratively harder to extract, with damage already done. That assumes of course that the next President isn&#8217;t a another Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/30/the-perils-of-bypassing-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-2260265</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=240665#comment-2260265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless of course, chaos and legal log jams are your goal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless of course, chaos and legal log jams are your goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>