That cuddly kitty is deadlier than you think
In a report that scaled up local surveys and pilot studies to national dimensions, scientists from the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and the Fish and Wildlife Service estimated that domestic cats in the United States — both the pet Fluffies that spend part of the day outdoors and the unnamed strays and ferals that never leave it — kill a median of 2.4 billion birds and 12.3 billion mammals a year, most of them native mammals like shrews, chipmunks and voles rather than introduced pests like the Norway rat.
The estimated kill rates are two to four times higher than mortality figures previously bandied about, and position the domestic cat as one of the single greatest human-linked threats to wildlife in the nation. More birds and mammals die at the mouths of cats, the report said, than from automobile strikes, pesticides and poisons, collisions with skyscrapers and windmills and other so-called anthropogenic causes.
Peter Marra of the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and an author of the report, said the mortality figures that emerge from the new model “are shockingly high.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Has Allah weighed in on this yet?
Bmore on January 30, 2013 at 5:00 PM
It’s Alligators here in Florida.
RadClown on January 30, 2013 at 5:00 PM
The last time outdoor cats were banned, a third of the world’s population died.
Having said that, if you care about your cats, you keep them indoors…there’s no reason for them to be messing with the feral ‘exterminator’ cats.
James on January 30, 2013 at 5:10 PM
In most urban settings it’s the Chinese restuarants.
Flange on January 30, 2013 at 5:16 PM
Cats are generally more useful pets than dogs outside of home protection (dogs advantage there) and companionship (about equal depending on your preference for one or the other). Cats pretty much pay their way in terms of vermin control while most dogs don’t really do much killing (and cause a lot of home insurance claims). Of course its all about what kind of pet you like anyway so…
theblackcommenter on January 30, 2013 at 5:16 PM
I hate cats.
redlucy on January 30, 2013 at 5:24 PM
Huh. Our dog has scored numerous birds and squirrels in the last few years (running free in the entire backyard, instead of just in the dog run). She *hates* squirrels. And Jet Li has *nothing* on her when it comes to running up a fence or tree when chasing them.
GWB on January 30, 2013 at 5:33 PM
I live in a rural area and my two felines are working cats — they control vermin. The alternative would be to put out poison and endanger far more wildlife than voles and mice.
jix on January 30, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Are you certain?
Bmore on January 30, 2013 at 5:40 PM
The headline of the article is extremely slanted…to the point of presenting a grossly ignorant and/or dishonest viewpoint.
The fact is that, without cats, hundreds of thousands of humans would perish from deadly diseases spread by rats, mice, and other pests. (“Pests” is actually a much-too-polite term)
Apparently, the authors of this article belong to the group of liberals (many claiming to be “environmentalists”) who seem to be completely ignorant of basic biological facts, and who do not understand that “control” (i.e. KILLING) of one species by another is a VITAL part of “nature.” Such ignoramuses seem to think that all living things can coexist in an environment where nothing dies: this is, of course, IMPOSSIBLE.
landlines on January 30, 2013 at 5:53 PM
Spot on.
Bmore on January 30, 2013 at 9:19 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2