What difference, at this point, does it make?
The Department of Education. The department was created in 1980 for the express purpose of improving U.S. students’ academic performance. Since then, per pupil K-12 spending has increased (in constant dollars) from approximately $6,000 annually to $12,500. Hundreds of billions have been spent by the department since 1980, yet the scores for the nation’s 17-year-olds on the National Assessment of Educational Progress — called “the nation’s report card” — have remained unchanged, and U.S performance is slipping relative to other nations. What difference, at this point, does the Department of Education make?
The Stimulus. The Obama administration promised that if Congress passed the $814,000,000,000 stimulus, unemployment today would be 5.2 percent. It’s now 7.8 percent, and as noted by James Pethokoukis, had millions not dropped out of the job market the unemployment rate today would be 10.7 percent — nearly three points higher than when the stimulus was passed. What difference, at this point, did the stimulus make.
Head Start. The program was created in 1965 to, among other things, improve the cognitive performance of poor kids. Hundreds of billions have been spent on the program, but recent studies show it does nothing for the cognitive abilities of kids enrolled in the program, with any transient benefits disappearing by the time the kids reach third grade. What difference, at this point, does Head Start make?











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I read this earlier today. An awesome set of simple arguments that no liberal can refute without resorting to shouting “RAAAAACIST!” or weeping like John Boehner.
wildcat72 on January 28, 2013 at 9:31 PM
Meanwhile in L.A. the teachers are sexually assaulting their students on a regular basis.
Success! Forward! Hope and Change!
Bishop on January 28, 2013 at 9:36 PM
Genius. But as we know full well, no Republican (with the exception of Gingrich) will employ this tatic. Unleash the Newt!
nobar on January 28, 2013 at 9:40 PM
My ideal candidate would be someone like Michele Bachman or Rand Paul who learned to attack the premise of the moderator’s bias in a debate like Newt.
wildcat72 on January 28, 2013 at 9:45 PM
Sadly, liberal response is predictable: “but think how much WORSE off we’d be without any of these things”
Like the ‘jobs saved’ statistics: “sure we may have lost X number of jobs, but without O we would have lost X + Y jobs, therefore Y jobs saved!”
CityFish on January 28, 2013 at 9:52 PM
“But we have to try something.”
Paul-Cincy on January 28, 2013 at 10:17 PM