Hey, let’s encourage democracy in Saudi Arabia
What should the United States do about this changing Saudi Arabia? Its real dependence on Saudi oil, Riyadh’s key role in the current security architecture, and the transition costs of a new strategy can’t be wished away. Allies should be engaged with a presumption of partnership, not one-sided lectures or sudden, erratic policy shifts. But America cannot continue to ignore the increasingly clear tension between its stated policy goals. It should at least avoid accepting or endorsing the status quo, and should do far more to nurture the emerging new Saudi public sphere. For instance, the symbolism of President Obama’s unusual meeting with new Saudi Interior Minister Mohammed bin Nayef, which looked to many Saudis like an endorsement of someone they identify with the most repressive and anti-democratic trends in the kingdom, was unfortunate.
Does Washington have any leverage? Maybe. The day after his lengthy interrogation over various ill-defined charges, the impressive human rights campaigner Mohammed Fahad al-Qahtani told me that the United States urgently needed to do more to support these emerging voices. Qahtani, like others, thinks that Obama could significantly help this emerging new reformist discourse — and that engaging with them would ultimately be decisively in the interests of both Washington and Saudi Arabia itself. While many were dismissive of the 30 women appointed by King Abdullah to the Shura Council, for instance, one women’s rights activist with whom I spoke argued strongly for its significance. Their presence, she insisted, was symbolically important and would make it far easier for them to get women’s issues onto the Shura Council’s (admittedly lean) agenda. If this were simply a public relations move to appease the United States (“the Hillary Clinton Council,” as several Saudis called it), she argued, then it should be taken as a positive example of how American pressure could help. Change will not come quickly, but Obama should speak out against the prosecution of such liberal reformists and apply the same standards on the right to free expression in Saudi Arabia that he does elsewhere in the region.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
You forgot the “What could go wrong?” prefix.
ThePrez on January 25, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Why sure thing! We can give them one year to switch to a democratic western system of government or they can kiss all American aid goodbye forever!
MelonCollie on January 25, 2013 at 4:42 PM
Yeah, since we are batting 1000 on this Arab Spring deal so far.
Cindy Munford on January 25, 2013 at 4:44 PM
Uh, Saudi Arabia already has “democracy” – you know, obama’s Egyptian-Style “sharia-democracy” (wink-wink).
Pork-Chop on January 25, 2013 at 4:46 PM
One or two more of these and best case we can leave them in their sandbox to play with themselves.
Drained Brain on January 25, 2013 at 4:46 PM
They tried it. No one showed up to vote. Instead of dipping your finger in ink to prove you voted they chopped off your hand.
Rocks on January 25, 2013 at 4:50 PM
Normally I’d say: Why? Do you want them to elect Osama bin Laden as president?
But… well, y’know…
JohnGalt23 on January 25, 2013 at 4:50 PM
Screw that.
Let’s find some *real* Islamists and give them lots of money, weapons, and intel.
I’ve always thought the Saud family were too milquetoast. Lets get us some headchoppers.
CorporatePiggy on January 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Just for once, let’s just leave things the hell alone!
OldEnglish on January 25, 2013 at 5:18 PM
NOW you want to do this after you guys allowed the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists to take over? Shutting the barn door after the cow got out much?
Warner Todd Huston on January 25, 2013 at 5:23 PM
This guy was saying the same thing back in the day about Egypt; he claimed the Muslim Brotherhood would never gain power there, because Egypt was really secular. If you want to, you can read his predictions about Egypt at that website.
When does a pundit have to be so wrong that we just start ignoring him?
blue13326 on January 25, 2013 at 6:27 PM
This guy was saying the same thing back in the day about Egypt; he claimed the Muslim Brotherhood would never gain power there, because Egypt was really secular. If you want to, you can read his predictions about Egypt at that website.
When does a pundit have to be so wrong that we just start ignoring him?
blue13326 on January 25, 2013 at 6:27 PM
Dick Morris
DiscePati on January 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM