Actually, Mr. President, we are a nation of takers
Consider:
• Over the 50-plus years since 1960, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, entitlement transfers—government payments of cash, goods and services to citizens—have been growing twice as fast as overall personal income. Government transfers now account for nearly 18% of all personal income in America—up from 6% in 1960.
• According to the BEA, America’s myriad social-welfare programs (the federal bureaucracy apparently cannot determine exactly how many of these there are) currently dispense entitlement benefits of more than $2.3 trillion annually. Since those entitlements must be paid for—either through taxes or borrowing—the burden of entitlement spending now amounts to over $7,400 per American man, woman and child.
• In 1960, according to the Office of Management and Budget, social-welfare programs accounted for less than a third of all federal spending. Today, entitlement programs account for nearly two-thirds of federal spending. In other words, welfare spending is nearly twice as much as defense, justice and everything else Washington does—combined. In effect, the federal government has become an entitlements machine.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Good to know that this is what 25,000 Americans died fighting to create.
Bishop on January 25, 2013 at 10:10 AM
But the GOP is incapable of and unwilling to even make the argument that individual freedom and free markets provide greater upward mobility than government handouts and trinkets. Just depressing.
besser tot als rot on January 25, 2013 at 10:13 AM
And sill hey said “we didn’t do enough”…”those damn evil Rethuglicans!”
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on January 25, 2013 at 10:14 AM
What difference does it make? Just gimme my Obamaphone and birth control pills and stop being so judgmental.
forest on January 25, 2013 at 10:16 AM
The fact more people are receiving entitlement payments now than in the past will only lead liberals to believe they haven’t “done enough”.
Occam’s Razor is a foreign concept to them.
ButterflyDragon on January 25, 2013 at 10:22 AM
Grand theft – money.
OldEnglish on January 25, 2013 at 10:29 AM
If you really want to know the Democrats’ plan which they will not speak of, it’s pretty easy to figure out:
run up debt to catastrophic levels by consolidating political power with free $hit giveaways then…
a) slash the Pentagon down to Western European levels
b) single payer rationed healthcare
c) sin taxes (raises revenue and reduces health costs)
d) VAT or carbon tax or both
e) higher progressive income taxes
crrr6 on January 25, 2013 at 10:35 AM
Let’s do that math a little differently, shall we?
$2.3 trillion divided over number of taxpayers (145,320,000 in 2011):
$15,800+
GWB on January 25, 2013 at 10:37 AM
Your nom de plume is killing me. Talk about a 180° from the other one, lol.
Fallon on January 25, 2013 at 10:46 AM
I like to look at it this way. A true fair tax is where everyone pays an equal amount.
240,000,000 adults in this nation. $3,800,000,000,000 budget = $15,833.33 tax bill for every man and woman.
astonerii on January 25, 2013 at 10:54 AM
Why do you leave children out?
Dusty on January 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM
Ever heard the saying: Don’t cry over spilt milk. That.
tommy71 on January 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM
They have no vote.
astonerii on January 25, 2013 at 11:56 AM
Who do you think is going to pay the interest on Oblah-blah’s est. $20 Trillion National Debt?
Phil-351 on January 25, 2013 at 12:52 PM
They have no vote.
[astonerii on January 25, 2013 at 11:56 AM]
I agree with the principle inherent in your method, especially if taken for it’s effort as both fairness and simplicity as well as for the fact it is silent on what the scope of government should be. In that sense, I see it as fair tax ideally.
My problem is with using it in the current environment. A large percentage of that upkeep is directly due to those 70 million citizens you do not count, and it is the only “property”, if you will, that I can think of which in any appreciable manner affects the cost of government and I think it should, at least, be addressed if this method is were implemented, again in the current environment.
Dusty on January 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM
Who do you think is going to pay the interest on Oblah-blah’s est. $20 Trillion National Debt?
[Phil-351 on January 25, 2013 at 12:52 PM]
Why is your question relevant?
Dusty on January 25, 2013 at 12:59 PM