The most consequential election of 2012
Walker tackled the immovable obstacle head-on by limiting public-sector union collective bargaining, requiring unions to hold annual recertification votes (which would require 51 percent of members, not just those who vote, to approve) and prohibiting automatic payroll deduction of union dues. In short, he required the unions to prove that their members actually stand behind them.
The unions launched a scorched-earth campaign in response. Noisy protesters filled the State Capitol for weeks on end, vowing to make an example out of Walker. They proceeded to lose a series of special elections, culminating in Walker beating their recall effort by a larger margin than he had won the governorship by in the first place.
For a while, it looked like that a pyrrhic victory for Walker, since the unions had also succeeded in tying up the reforms in court. Two judges had stayed the reforms, and their future looked shaky. But on Friday, a three-judge appeals court panel upheld them, rejecting the unions’ argument that the reforms were unconstitutional because they excluded police and firefighters and therefore violated the equal-protection clause.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Only because P.BO didn’t lose.
Count to 10 on January 24, 2013 at 5:45 PM
Replacing Obama with his third rate carbon copy would not a consequential outcome be.
astonerii on January 24, 2013 at 6:02 PM
Are you guys ever going to get over the “sour grapes” defense mechanism?
Count to 10 on January 24, 2013 at 6:06 PM