The key to increasing upward mobility? Expanding vocabulary
Vocabulary doesn’t just help children do well on verbal exams. Studies have solidly established the correlation between vocabulary and real-world ability. Many of these studies examine the Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT), which the military devised in 1950 as an entrance requirement and a job-allocating device. The exam consists of two verbal sections (on vocabulary size and paragraph comprehension) and two math sections. The military has determined that the test predicts real-world job performance most accurately when you double the verbal score and add it to the math score. Once you perform that adjustment, according to a 1999 study by Christopher Winship and Sanders Korenman, a gain of one standard deviation on the AFQT raises one’s annual income by nearly $10,000 (in 2012 dollars). Other studies show that much of the disparity in the black-white wage gap disappears when you take AFQT scores—again, weighted toward the verbal side—into account.
Such correlations between vocabulary size and life chances are as firm as any correlations in educational research. Of course, vocabulary isn’t perfectly correlated with knowledge. People with similar vocabulary sizes may vary significantly in their talent and in the depth of their understanding. Nonetheless, there’s no better index to accumulated knowledge and general competence than the size of a person’s vocabulary. Simply put: knowing more words makes you smarter. And between 1962 and the present, a big segment of the American population began knowing fewer words, getting less smart, and becoming demonstrably less able to earn a high income.
Why should vocabulary size be related to achieved intelligence and real-world competence? Though the intricate details of cognitive abilities are under constant study and refinement, it’s possible to give a rough answer. The space where we solve our problems is called “working memory.” For everyone, even geniuses, it’s a small space that can hold only a few items in suspension for only a few seconds. If one doesn’t make the right connections within that space, one has to start over again.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
So screaming “Give me my shiit before I get prehistoric on yo azz, mofacky!” like the people did at the St. Louis welfare office isn’t indicative of a well-rounded vocabulary?
Bishop on January 24, 2013 at 9:04 PM
With texting now so common, good luck with that!
SouthernGent on January 24, 2013 at 9:06 PM
Exactly what I thought. Maybe tone down a few of the F-bombs in that interview, mate.
John the Libertarian on January 24, 2013 at 9:07 PM
Ha ~ I’ve been criticized for not writing like the average FaceDURRRK update in company emails.
(of course, I have been praised for it, too – today even!)
Jeddite on January 24, 2013 at 9:18 PM
When you have to ask someone behind the counter to repeat themselves in order to understand them, you question and at the same time, understand why they are there.
SteveInRTP on January 24, 2013 at 10:31 PM
I thought it was crushing tax rates. Or, that’s what the Democrats tell me anyway.
besser tot als rot on January 24, 2013 at 10:35 PM
Well, my vocabulary isn’t very good, but that hasn’t stopped me from growing up a po’ dunk redneck in a trailer to being a 1%er. So, I don’t know how much I believe this. Granted, my evidence is anecdotal, but anecdotal evidence that comes from your own personal experience tends to have a greater impact on your perceptions.
besser tot als rot on January 24, 2013 at 10:44 PM
Those three sentences just proved the theory. IMHO
SteveInRTP on January 24, 2013 at 10:47 PM
To say esl and ebonics put a student at a disadvantage is racist!!!
I say structure “reading” so that a 6th grader can read the unabridged treasure island, ivanhoe and other classics and they’ll be well on their way to greater vocabulary. The king James bible is good for that but it’s been banned.
AH_C on January 24, 2013 at 11:17 PM
When I was in high school, about sixty years ago, I had to take two courses that proved to be emensely valuable: Latin and Typing. I thought at the time that ‘Why am I being forced to learn a Dead Language? And why do I need to learn Touch Typing, isn’t that something that Secretaries are supposed to do?
Later I found that the Latin allowed me to immediately understand the meaning of any new word. And the typing has proved to be invaluable in writing memos and reports.
I feel so sorry for the present High School graduate who has been cheated out of this advantage.
Uniblogger on January 24, 2013 at 11:25 PM