Jay Carney rejects idea of carbon tax
White House spokesman Jay Carney Jan. 23 deflated environmentalists’ hope of a major federal program to counter climate change, by declaring that the “we have no intention of proposing a carbon tax.”
Carney’s statement is a letdown for progressive climate-control advocates, who say the federal government has the regulatory and taxing power to try to affect the globe’s temperature by curbing the release of carbon dioxide from cars, houses, factories, power plants.
On Jan 9, Vermont’s Sen. Bernie Saunders introduced a bill that would levy a tax on companies that generate carbon dioxide. The bill is unlikely to pass, partly because economists argue it would further burden the nation’s slow growing economy.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Anti-human these nutters are.
jawkneemusic on January 24, 2013 at 12:13 AM
Um… is there a reason why we’d believe what Carney says about anything?
Warner Todd Huston on January 24, 2013 at 12:19 AM
The carbon tax is just a way for them to get the money they want. If Carney says they won’t try to get it through the carbon tax, it’s because they have other ideas about getting it that they believe have a better chance of success.
Dusty on January 24, 2013 at 12:40 AM
A ‘Carbon Tax’? Heck no, we won’t do that! A tax on. All energy used, now that is something else….
cntrlfrk on January 24, 2013 at 6:32 AM
Just a new regulation will do. One where it takes 12 people to sit in an Office and fill out forms and run test and fill out other forms and fill documents and reports to the EPA to comply with the regulations. This in turn reduces the money and profit that the energy companies make as they have to pay the 12 people to comply with the regulations. They can not invest in new ways because they have to pay to retrofit the old ways.
tjexcite on January 24, 2013 at 7:26 AM
Say one thing, do another. Always watch what the other hand is doing.
petefrt on January 24, 2013 at 7:27 AM
No, but as we all know, approving and inventing “taxes” (even if the government goes in not even arguing that it is a tax) to override our Constitutional Rights is Chief “Justice” John Roberts specialty…
wildcat72 on January 24, 2013 at 7:45 AM