Comments on: It’s time for the U.S. to intervene in Mali

By: MelonCollie

MelonCollie — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 01:26:26 +0000

Detonate neutron bombs and blame it on terrorists. I’ll push the button.

By: Speakup

Speakup — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:51:29 +0000

So long as the munitions (and only munitions) used were not allowed to be anything lighter than 2klb bombs, sure go ahead.

By: Hill60

Hill60 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:17:58 +0000

BL@KBIRD on January 24, 2013 at 4:55 PM

Bwahahahahahahaha!
Seriously, I almost did a spit-take with my water.

By: BL@KBIRD

BL@KBIRD — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:55:00 +0000

Sometimes it is a good idea to depoliticize world events and view them as they appear to be rather than through a partisan kaleidoscope.

By: trs

trs — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:45:27 +0000

War President (TM)

By: ThePrez

ThePrez — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:33:58 +0000

If we leave Mali alone, think the Jihadists will sit quietly and govern their own little world there? Would containment work better?

By: BuckeyeSam

BuckeyeSam — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:32:14 +0000

The author was in my AP U.S. History class in high school.

I wonder what Mrs. Bazell would say.

By: Jabberwock

Jabberwock — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:28:17 +0000

Special operations forces and CIA paramilitaries could conduct raids against insurgent headquarters and heavy weapons caches.

I read this as cleaning up the mess they left in Libya.

Guess we needed “boots on the ground” after all.

By: Resist We Much

Resist We Much — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:27:28 +0000

It is? You mean we have to go and help out the country that screamed about America “going it alone” then went it alone and found out that they couldn’t get the job done?

By: mythicknight

mythicknight — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:25:04 +0000

No more nation building.

If we’re going in, rush in, kill, then get the hell out.