It’s time for the U.S. to intervene in Mali
The United States already supplies France with intelligence support, including satellite imagery and signals intercepts. The White House is also considering providing refueling for French aircraft. But there are a variety of additional means the U.S. could employ short of a major ground action.
The U.S could conduct airstrikes in support of French troops and the African forces expected to deploy in the coming weeks. Special operations forces and CIA paramilitaries could conduct raids against insurgent headquarters and heavy weapons caches.
These low-cost, low-commitment measures would have a devastating effect on the jihadist insurgency. Guerrilla groups are at their most vulnerable when they attempt to seize and hold terrain. The opening months of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan in 2001 demonstrated the effectiveness of augmenting non-U.S. coalition ground forces with such critical capabilities.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No.
BISHOP!
RayinVA on January 24, 2013 at 3:43 PM
what could go wrong? /s
Joey24007 on January 24, 2013 at 3:44 PM
Let
Mali
Burn.
Joe Mama on January 24, 2013 at 3:44 PM
No.
Mali can come after we intervene in Chicago.
vityas on January 24, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Who cares about any of this – per (Joe Mamma) – let them burn
jake-the-goose on January 24, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Damn Chimpy McBu$hitler and his illegal wars on dark-skinned peoples!
Oh. Never mind, then.
Support the troops!
/O-bot
JimLennon on January 24, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Mali is a nation that from March to December 2012 had two coups.
Joey24007 on January 24, 2013 at 3:47 PM
This would end the 40 year streak of Democrats only using al qaeda as ground troops in the military actions they initiated or joined ( as opposed to inherited ). I’m guessing al qaeda will want no part of the operation since they are the other side. We should help the Democrats do it so they can kick their al qaeda dependency.
Buddahpundit on January 24, 2013 at 3:48 PM
Yea! Another desert country filled with transnational criminal syndicates and religious fundamentalists!
I can’t possibly see a reason to not grab this hornet’s nest with both hands and shake it hard.
LincolntheHun on January 24, 2013 at 3:51 PM
sure, why not…
equanimous on January 24, 2013 at 3:51 PM
The terrorist are already blending in with the locals- just like in Afghanistan and Iraq. How many years do you want us in Mali?
michaelo on January 24, 2013 at 3:53 PM
“What difference does it make!”
the_nile on January 24, 2013 at 3:53 PM
Hey moonbats…we just ended a decade of war…well unless you count Libya, and Egypt, and as Romney warned mali….
and Afghanistan is still ongoing….
but other than that Barack ended war….
no no really…
Mali was done with Egyptian guns given by people we empowered.
Sweet dreams America the media will never tell you.
harlekwin15 on January 24, 2013 at 3:57 PM
What is our national interest in Mali? France is a wealthy western nation with a declared national interest in a former colony bordering on Libya and Algeria. Let them fight this war.
iconoclast on January 24, 2013 at 4:00 PM
Don’t know much about history.
Especially with the French
Jabberwock on January 24, 2013 at 4:02 PM
And up until today I would’ve said thank goodness my daughters will never be drafted. You know that’s now on the table.
NebCon on January 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM
Yea because it worked out so well in Libya. Funny how the left loves Obama’s foreign endeavors no matter how unsuccessful they have been yet hated Chimpy McBush’s even though his largely succeeded.
jawkneemusic on January 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM
No…Boy the left just loves to bomb stuff now don’t they? It’s the French, just remember Dien Bien Phu.
major dad on January 24, 2013 at 4:24 PM
No more nation building.
If we’re going in, rush in, kill, then get the hell out.
mythicknight on January 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM
It is? You mean we have to go and help out the country that screamed about America “going it alone” then went it alone and found out that they couldn’t get the job done?
Resist We Much on January 24, 2013 at 4:27 PM
I read this as cleaning up the mess they left in Libya.
Guess we needed “boots on the ground” after all.
Jabberwock on January 24, 2013 at 4:28 PM
The author was in my AP U.S. History class in high school.
I wonder what Mrs. Bazell would say.
BuckeyeSam on January 24, 2013 at 4:32 PM
If we leave Mali alone, think the Jihadists will sit quietly and govern their own little world there? Would containment work better?
ThePrez on January 24, 2013 at 4:33 PM
War President (TM)
trs on January 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM
Sometimes it is a good idea to depoliticize world events and view them as they appear to be rather than through a partisan kaleidoscope.
BL@KBIRD on January 24, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Bwahahahahahahaha!
Seriously, I almost did a spit-take with my water.
Hill60 on January 24, 2013 at 5:17 PM
So long as the munitions (and only munitions) used were not allowed to be anything lighter than 2klb bombs, sure go ahead.
Speakup on January 24, 2013 at 5:51 PM
Detonate neutron bombs and blame it on terrorists. I’ll push the button.
MelonCollie on January 24, 2013 at 8:26 PM