The GOP’s short-term debt-ceiling hike: A good first step that’s already working
Even more important is the beginning of the return to regular order. For two years the President and Leader Reid allied to bypass the standard legislative process and instead force fiscal policy to be negotiated in ad hoc private talks between the President and Speaker Boehner. This bill looks likely to produce a regular order two-fer: the President is largely on the sidelines on the details of this bill, and the Senate Democratic majority appears headed toward reestablishing the normal budget process.
By setting the next debt limit deadline in mid-May, well after the sequester is triggered, the continuing resolution expires, and the budget resolution deadlines, this bill reorders the 2013 fiscal debates in a way that is advantageous to spending cutters. You want to have your strongest legislative levers up front, and if this bill becomes law they will be in the right order: sequester, then CR, with the weakest lever of debt limit last. That doesn’t mean that spending cutters will be able to force the President to fix everything, but at least they’re maximizing their leverage.
And if it works this time, as it appears likely it will, House Republicans can then repeat this tactic a few months from now. The challenge at that point will be coming up with and uniting around a similarly beneficial but modest fiscal policy change to attach to the next short-term increase. If conservatives want to pick a knockdown spending fight with the President, they’re better off doing that on the sequester and/or CR.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
A good first step…off the cliff.
That’s already working…to destroy our nation.
MelonCollie on January 23, 2013 at 1:05 PM
Really? I don’t see that. What’s in it for them?
Incidentally, re: the gun control debate, is there any greater proof that there is no law but force than the Democratic Senate, the President, and come to think of it, the 14 Presidents before him?
It is against the law – against the law – for Congress to not pass a budget. Technically, by continuing to conduct legislative business, Congress is in a state of r-word against the Constitution.
The law and $5 will get you a cup of Starbucks coffee.
HitNRun on January 23, 2013 at 1:08 PM
So your answer is trillion dollar deficits forever?
You know you’re the one who’s going to be paying it back, right?
Chuck Schick on January 23, 2013 at 1:11 PM
Try not being a liberal and think for ten seconds. Will not the Democrats use any debt-ceiling hike as an excuse to spend more?
The GOP’s ‘solution’ is like a credit card company dealing with someone who’s badly over the limit and overdue on paying a raise in their credit limit.
And thank you for pointing out the bloody obvious.
MelonCollie on January 23, 2013 at 1:17 PM
Whoopee! Thank god, because that’s worked so well before right?
Deck chairs, Titanic, etc….
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on January 23, 2013 at 1:23 PM
You and your liberal ilk should finally be forced to pass a budget and be on record for the utter destruction you’ve waged on our children’s futures. For all your failed Keynesian fantasies, you’ve saddled us with the worst recovery since the Great Depression and another 6 trillion in debt.
Chuck Schick on January 23, 2013 at 1:33 PM
If I recall MelonCollie is more conservative than your general run of the mill worthless piece of crap loser, Paul Ryan as an example, GOP person… Maybe I am thinking someone else…
I for one am willing to be happy with frequent debt ceiling fights over the next 4 years, rather than the punt the ball to after the next presidential election. I would prefer a hundred billion at a time increases…
astonerii on January 23, 2013 at 1:36 PM
It’s a lame concern troll schtick, but I agree with your second point.
Chuck Schick on January 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM
The only reason the Senate Democratic majority might want a return to the normal budget process is to add more spending. They want more than the spending levels of the last 4 years.
supernova on January 23, 2013 at 1:54 PM
Smoke and mirrors:
Difficultas_Est_Imperium on January 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM
It is stunning to watch foolish bloggers praise the suspension of article 1 of the US Constitution!
LAWSUITS must be filed against this UNCONSTITUTIONAL act IMMEDIATLY!
Somehow, even talk radio has decided that it is now OK to simply suspend the US Constitution.
How long will we wait for the 2nd ammendment to be ‘suspended’?
Freddy on January 23, 2013 at 2:08 PM
Can we get rid of social security tomorrow? If not, then you are just as guilty of arguing that the constitution has no meaning.
While the tax to collect social security money is constitutional, the payment of money to individuals for it has never even been brought to the Supreme Court.
astonerii on January 23, 2013 at 2:29 PM
When the democrats promptly take the GOP surrendering on a debt-ceiling hike as a clue to spend even more like a drunken sailor in a cathouse, may I at least say “told you so!” to people like Dumb as a Stick who think I’m not going to end up paying anyway?
MelonCollie on January 23, 2013 at 8:00 PM