There was no GOP entitlement-cutting plan
House Republicans placed themselves on the side of entitlement reform when they voted for the Ryan budget. But the Ryan budget was a far-reaching, intricately interconnected plan that addressed not only entitlement spending but taxes and revenues and more. It was not a proposal that Republicans could just throw at the president and say, Here, this is our position. As for the actions on entitlements that might have been part of GOP demands for a debt-ceiling deal, says one participant in the Williamsburg meeting: “Long term, those have to be figured out. But my sense of that is that it is not going to happen in ten days. This is complex, important.” In other words, there was no plan for major entitlement cuts as part of the debt-limit strategy.
Rather than come up with their own plan for extensive entitlement cuts, Republicans considered focusing on some smaller proposals that Obama has spoken of favorably in the past and has now abandoned. If the debate had reached a discussion of entitlements, it’s likely the GOP would have latched onto those and pushed for the president to live by his own words.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I’m shocked, shocked /
Firefly_76 on January 19, 2013 at 9:06 PM
The Ryan Budget is a strategy – not a weapon. Weapons fight the war – especially at close quarters, strategy plans the eventual outcome.
OldEnglish on January 19, 2013 at 9:08 PM
No sheeeeit, Sherlock…DC Enablers all
Gohawgs on January 19, 2013 at 9:15 PM
There isn’t one, because it would have no chance of getting through the Senate, and Obama would use it against the House GOP.
MetaThought on January 19, 2013 at 9:43 PM
Agreed – no point in tilting at windmills.
OldEnglish on January 19, 2013 at 9:46 PM
Really? Who was going to hold him against his own words? The media? LOL Yeah, sure. Keep dreaming.
ButterflyDragon on January 19, 2013 at 9:55 PM
The Ryan plan was kicking the can down the road for 30 years before it even balanced the budget around the year 2040. The idea that this plan would survive 7 different presidencies is laughable. It was a way for the GOP to pretend to do something, while doing nothing.
sharrukin on January 19, 2013 at 10:04 PM
Precisely. If the GOP wanted to do something about entitlements, they merely have to send one the the BBAs discussed in the last couple of years to the states for ratification. Now, you’d have to get some Democrats to agree so you will need to force their hand with something like, I don’t know, shutting down the government over the debt limit perhaps?
With a constitutional requirement to have a balanced budget and not spend more than 18% of GDP, every president and Congress (regardless of party) will be forced to work on spending reform, including entitlements.
However, the GOP will never do this because they’re sitting in the wings waiting for the day they’re back in the majority so they can feed at the public trough.
Odysseus on January 20, 2013 at 8:54 AM