The cynicism of Dick Morris
The longtime political consultant Dick Morris has a new book out, and—no, wait, don’t go away. Morris may not be a thoughtful pundit or an admirable man, but he sure makes an interesting case study.
The book is called Here Come the Black Helicopters!, and it is co-authored, as usual, by Morris’ wife Eileen McGann. It begins with an all-caps WARNING from the writers: “READING THIS BOOK AND ADOPTING THIS PREMISE MAY BE DANGEROUS TO YOUR REPUTATION AND LEAD TO CRITICISM AND RIDICULE FROM LIBERALS, GLOBALISTS, AND RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISTS.” They go on to explain that the term “black helicopter crowd” is “a derisive liberal buzz phrase used to categorize those who question the movement for global governance,” adding: “Of course, we don’t believe that there are actual black helicopters on the way to conquer the United States. But we do believe that the term ‘black helicopters’ is a useful metaphor for this attempt to erode our sovereignty by a network of United Nations treaties, codes, guidelines, and other resolutions.” …
Now Morris is adopting the rhetoric of the people he called paranoid and weird in the ’90s. The result comes off less as a cri de coeur than as a minstrel show, with Morris donning distorted features of the audience he imagines himself reaching. I’m sure the man has honestly changed his mind about various issues over the years, but he is also a notorious opportunist, and it’s hard not to read his book as an example of that opportunism in action.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Why is it that somebody who calls himself “Reason” never seems to have one of those.
Nobody cares. Dick Morris’ only claim to fame was dishing dirt on the Clintons. And he sucked at at.
logis on January 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM
\
If pun intended, good job.
YYZ on January 19, 2013 at 1:40 PM
Another pundit I threw on the useless dung heap.
John the Libertarian on January 19, 2013 at 1:45 PM
Who, exactly, is this Mick Doris?
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on January 19, 2013 at 1:53 PM
“Say Goodnight, Dick!”
Del Dolemonte on January 19, 2013 at 2:14 PM
Is the book going to be featured on UnskewedBooks.com?
lester on January 19, 2013 at 2:14 PM
Dick Morris is less accurate than a broken clock.
Joe Mama on January 19, 2013 at 2:29 PM
His time is up…I haven’t watched Fox for months, but whenever the big Dick was on, it was nothing but a promo for his website and books. A bigger shill there is not on TV, has he come out with a line of shirts and ties, cologne, or something, certainly not a stair-master…or health foods.
right2bright on January 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM
My collie says:
CyberCipher on January 19, 2013 at 2:56 PM
I am going to have to change my spell check, I guess cynicism and stupidity mean the same now…
right2bright on January 19, 2013 at 3:12 PM
ISWYDT.
Rebar on January 19, 2013 at 4:08 PM
You are the enemy now.
Schadenfreude on January 19, 2013 at 4:40 PM
No Minstrel show. IMHO he is not mocking his audience.
Morris is certainly an opportunist or he couldn’t have lasted with the Clintons. To be an opportunist, means one makes oneself useful.
In politics, when someone lands on the tabloids, it is usually because they have been placed there. At the point he was outed, he had to find another boss
To me this does not discount what Morris says. He is correct about the various UN treaty gimmicks. Congress does not simply ‘repeal’ treaties
Morris went from Clinton, to FOX. Now he is talking in a direction neither the Left, not the Upper Crust Right care to discuss, and he is being worked over in the press.
He didn’t call the election, but neither did Romney. Who were their sources? The election was close, not far, despite the missteps
Correct
If Morris is such a fool, why does the MSM care so much about warning everyone not to read what he writes? I would value his words over Chris Christie, J. Bush, or Boehner. Probably trust him more
entagor on January 19, 2013 at 4:57 PM