House GOP set to focus on sequester as key spending fight
If Democrats agree to pass the short-term debt ceiling hike with the budget requirement attached, it would force the party to lay out its spending priorities with less than two years until a half-dozen red-state Democrats face reelection. If they don’t, Republicans will paint them as irresponsible stewards of the public’s dollars. Such a measure also would satisfy conservative Republicans pushing for big spending cuts.
But practically, Republicans think they have more leverage if they reserve their firepower for fights over government funding and the sequester.
Here’s why: Top GOP aides say the spending battles — which will sprout in February and March — give them the leverage Obama enjoyed in the debate over the Bush tax hikes at the end of 2012.
Just like the tax hikes would have automatically taken hold on Jan. 1 without the fiscal cliff deal, steep automatic spending reductions will take hold on March 2 unless Congress acts. So when Boehner eventually negotiates with Obama over government funding and the sequester — which the GOP hopes will be paired in one fight — the GOP thinks Obama will want to protect the Pentagon by replacing the spending cuts with more targeted reductions. The goal of the Republican leadership is to convince Obama to enact some entitlement reform as part of those cuts.
Furthermore, if the sequester kicks in, Boehner will legitimately be able to tell conservatives that government funding has been slashed to the low levels supported by the conservative Republican Study Committee.
Then, in April, Republicans think they will be in a better position to fight on the debt ceiling once again.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The sequester is the Unfulfilled deal from the last debt ceiling raise. Obama ignored it during the campaign, the deadline for him to announce his “Smart cuts” was mid September, to tell us how he would prioritize on sequestration. He told Mitt Romney he had it under control. We see his CHOICE is to cut military spending to hurt as many as possible, some of us feel it is an act of loathing. His administration would not allow the defense contractors to send out the lay off notices during the campaign.
The last deal has not been completed until these cuts are made. No more “I will gladly pay you on Thursday for a hamburger (Kobe Beef) today.”
And a reminder. If Obama had prioritized and implemented the cuts, the last debt ceiling raise would have lasted that much longer.
And of course, I always say…no 2012-2013 budget, no future funding. No more blank checks.
Fleuries on January 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM
“GOP will focus on”.. Thats funny stuff. They’ll focus on it until Obama opens the door and throws a squirrel on the floor, then they’ll start running around chasing it.
Mimzey on January 19, 2013 at 9:45 AM
“GOP will focus on”.. Thats funny stuff. They’ll focus on it until Obama opens the door and throws a squirrel on the floor, then they’ll start running around chasing it.
Mimzey on January 19, 2013 at 9:45 AM
By Jove , I think you stated that perfectly .
Lucano on January 19, 2013 at 10:03 AM
Sequester is end result of raising the debt by a couple trillion dollars. Now the GOP wants to back off that too… It is pointless. Let it burn, add fuel and fan as needed to get it over with before we hand over the country to the next generation.
astonerii on January 19, 2013 at 10:05 AM
Mimzey knows.
davidk on January 19, 2013 at 10:05 AM
Wrong battle to fight. They should have made their stand at the debt ceiling. The sequester should be allowed to kick in. If you can’t cut that paltry spending, forget trying to get back to fiscal health.
tommy71 on January 19, 2013 at 12:23 PM