The facts about assault weapons and crime
Yes, the Bushmaster and the AK-47 are “military-style weapons.” But the key word is “style”—they are similar to military guns in their cosmetics, not in the way they operate. The guns covered by the original were not the fully automatic machine guns used by the military, but semiautomatic versions of those guns.
The civilian version of the Bushmaster uses essentially the same sorts of bullets as small game-hunting rifles, fires at the same rapidity (one bullet per pull of the trigger), and does the same damage. The civilian version of the AK-47 is similar, though it fires a much larger bullet—.30 inches in diameter, as opposed to the .223 inch rounds used by the Bushmaster. No self-respecting military in the world would use the civilian version of these guns.
A common question is: “Why do people need a semiautomatic Bushmaster to go out and kill deer?” The answer is simple: It is a hunting rifle. It has just been made to look like a military weapon.
But the point isn’t to help hunters. Semiautomatic weapons also protect people and save lives. Single-shot rifles that require you to physically reload the gun may not do people a lot of good when they are facing multiple criminals or when their first shot misses or fails to stop an attacker.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Fact don’t matter. Haven’t you realized that yet.
cw10036 on January 18, 2013 at 9:09 AM
Facts? We don’ need no steenkin’ facts! We don’ have to show you no facts!
Oldnuke on January 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM
An article titled “Feelings about assault weapons and crime” would be more useful in today’s world.
Flange on January 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM
It doesn’t matter how many ‘assault’ weapons are used in crime. We, the people, have the right to own them.
AND THAT RIGHT SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON.
tom daschle concerned on January 18, 2013 at 9:14 AM
Bushmaster
It is a fking AR. There are myriad AR manufacturers. Is “Bushmaster” particularly skeery to you feckless reprobate libtards?
tom daschle concerned on January 18, 2013 at 9:16 AM
Feelings, you’re right it’s all about feelings and “Scary looking”. Here’s how I feel. There’s only one kind of “Scary looking” gun and it looks like this.
Oldnuke on January 18, 2013 at 9:17 AM
Be careful where you point that thing. You might hurt someones feeling with that thing.
Flange on January 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM
It isn’t Bushmaster that is scary, it is bushwhacker.
Limerick on January 18, 2013 at 9:28 AM
Here are a few additional “facts”:
Most states do NOT allow the .223 to be used for deer hunting, because it has insufficient power for the task.
Most military’s have moved to the .223, which in military circles is called a 5.56x45mm, or the 7.62x49mm in the case of the AK series; because the smaller and lighter ammo allows troops to carry more rounds into battle, not because the rounds are so good at killing people.
The “Bushmaster” claim to fame is not that it is the best of the AR-15 platform, but that it is cheap. The company is well known primarily owing to sensationalism from the media.
MikeA on January 18, 2013 at 9:29 AM
Interesting question. Too bad the Second Amendment has nothing to do with Hunting.
Fleuries on January 18, 2013 at 9:50 AM
But, but, high magazine clips!!!1111
WisCon on January 18, 2013 at 9:57 AM
Yes. And it’s Bush’s fault.
The Rogue Tomato on January 18, 2013 at 9:57 AM
When I just know it’s wrong I don’t need your facts.
Now get out of the way or I’ll run you down with my Prius.
roy_batty on January 18, 2013 at 10:09 AM
Did anyone hear Lott’s takedown of the “40% of firearms sales are unregistered” on Levin yesterday?
40% is based on a Clinton-era survey of 251 people! The overwhelming majority of those who fell in the magical 40% realm were ones that either inherited or were given a firearm from a family member.
roy_batty on January 18, 2013 at 10:16 AM
Sure it does. It just has to do with hunting tyrants, not critters…
JohnGalt23 on January 18, 2013 at 10:37 AM
Be vewy vewy quiet. I’m hunting tywants. Heheheheheheheheheheheh.
The Rogue Tomato on January 18, 2013 at 10:42 AM
Please don’t inform the liberals with facts. We’ll just tell them we’ve resigned ourselves and are willing to accept a ban on high-capacity clips.
(Yes, I DO know the difference between a clip and a magazine.)
michaelo on January 18, 2013 at 11:25 AM
Every single time someone advocates for limiting our rights under the 2nd Amendment, he or she should be asked if citizens should have the right to bear arms. Any answer to that question other than an unqualified ‘yes’ is indefensible and a public relations/political win for our side.
Knott Buyinit on January 18, 2013 at 11:55 AM