Mark Steyn: “Screw Algeria’s sovereignty,” rescue the hostages
“I mean, ‘Algerian special forces’ is something of a contradiction in terms,” Steyn said. “I think when these things happen somewhere on the other side of the world, you hope that the highly trained elite forces will come to the rescue. And that belongs to a very select group of nations. I mean, if you remember that Russian theater siege for example, where the Russians went in and killed a bunch of people — I mean, even the Russians aren’t any good at that. There’s maybe half-a-dozen nations in the world capable of rescuing those guys without leaving a lot of blood on the floor.”
“It does call into question — I mean I would have thought that the first thing that would happen is that the nationals, the government of the nationals being held hostage would have conferred as to who had people, who could get there and screw Algeria’s sovereignty,” he continued. “We got into a lot of trouble in Libya from over-respecting the sovereignty of nations that cannot enforce their own sovereignty. And that’s what we should have done in Algeria, too. We should take as saying we’re not going to fuss about visas from the Algerians.”











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Whaddya think the American hostages are hoping?
Akzed on January 18, 2013 at 4:16 PM
Once upon a time we had a policy of treating an attack on Americans anywhere as an attack on America. Response was swift and sure. “We want either Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead.”
Carter, Clinton and now Obama have abandoned that policy and abandoned Americans in harm’s way. Ever more Americans will be attacked as a result.
novaculus on January 18, 2013 at 4:25 PM
And the world watched as we did nothing about the attack on our embassy in Benghazi. Al qaeda knows they can walk all over us and there will be no consequences. Sad.
UltimateBob on January 18, 2013 at 4:29 PM
Alternative Mark Steyn headline if we’d gone in:
This is so old. It’s been four years of wait for what Obama does, then advocate the opposite.
lester on January 18, 2013 at 4:53 PM
lester is always such a lightweight.
With Obama it’s obvious what he always does – what’s good for him. Period.
Obama and his brothers are proceeding according to plans. They succeed beautifully because the people are too dumb to see what they do.
Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 5:19 PM
That’s because on virtually every issue he’s been on the wrong side. Honduras, Libya, the Arab Spring, Libya again, etc. With the notable exception of Bin Laden, and he had to be dragged to that one, kicking and screaming.
Mitoch55 on January 18, 2013 at 5:19 PM
Soon Obama, having failed with the gun bla, bla, bla, will divert the US and world populace’s attention from economic/jobs woes by entering Africa with more troops. He needs to divert until 2014. Then he’ll hand out more goodies, to bring Pelosi’s hammer back. May she be in a chreche by then, with Reid and McCain.
Schadenfreude on January 18, 2013 at 5:21 PM
You have no idea what you’re talking about.
Conservatives have not complained that Obama ordered the hit on Osama (which did involve invading sovereign Pakistani territory).
You’re whole comment is a joke because it doesn’t describe conservatives at all – who have been very consistent – but it does perfectly describe liberals during Bush’s two terms – particularly Obama. It’s great going back to all those classic Senator Obama moments where he calls deficit spending unpatriotic, refuses to raise the debt ceiling for the children and all the rest of it. President Obama is everything Senator Obama called evil and wrong with the world.
gwelf on January 18, 2013 at 5:23 PM