Why Obama might choose to lose on guns
But this isn’t only a battle between Obama and Republicans. His expansive gun restriction proposal immediately ran up against potentially fatal opposition: Senate Democrats may act only narrowly on Obama’s sweeping proposal, and House Speaker John Boehner says he won’t act unless the Senate does.
This is one fight House Republicans are looking forward to: GOP aides told POLITICO that the president’s push would most likely set up a confrontation with his own party just as he had successfully exploited fractures in the GOP…
Senior Senate aides say Obama will have to do what he has never been willing to do before: lobby Democrats one by one, making the case that a perilous vote is the right thing to do. “[He] should engage with the individual senators who are championing different pieces of this legislation, work to move them forward and also reach out personally to those who may be on the fence to make the case for the policy — and if they believe the politics have changed post-Sandy Hook, why they believe that to be the case,” said a senior Democratic staffer involved in deliberations on the gun issue.
That calculus — a possible Senate thumbs-up coupled with a certain House thumbs-down — used to be enough to deter the president from making an all-out push. Obama’s cautious approach to controversy led his administration to slow-walk action on immigration, climate change, labor rights and gun control during his first term, according to advocates who lobbied the administration on those issues and operatives close to the White House.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
So yeah, this’ll be dead by next week.
One wonders if the Dems will remember how quick the liberal puissance and jubilation from Term 1 Year 1 became the digging in, equivocating, retreat and eventual rout of 2010.
Even if they don’t – and really, so much the better – it’s amazing how far Congressional Dems have fallen from “this election means the change of the composition of the planet and the very building blocks of matter” to “maybe I can avoid losing my seat next year if I vote for gun control but probably not.”
HitNRun on January 17, 2013 at 1:27 PM
Cuz maybe it’s just a distraction while they borrow and spend more loot?
rhombus on January 17, 2013 at 1:29 PM
Because Obama needs a huge distraction from the reality that he is bankrupting the country at the rate of over a trillion dollars a year.
cool breeze on January 17, 2013 at 1:36 PM
WHEN he loses – he will simply say that he wanted to lose – and he’ll walk away with his magical “lord and savior” status intact.
Pork-Chop on January 17, 2013 at 1:37 PM
So, this is the new “spin”; Obama “chose” to lose on this issue, rather than he over-reached, mis-read and was defeated. “Those grapes were sour anyway” springs to mind.
JFKY on January 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM
Obama feeds on carrion.
Obama hates black children. He did nothing for them.
Obama is always a hypocrite.
Goebbels loves Obama.
Schadenfreude on January 17, 2013 at 1:39 PM
Give him his “I Tried” sticker and be done with it.
D-fusit on January 17, 2013 at 1:43 PM
Obama has repeatedly issued “non-negotiable” proposals.
No need to read further. The author is either divorced from reality, or just another water boy lying through his teeth.
novaculus on January 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM
He might not have a choice.
UltimateBob on January 17, 2013 at 1:56 PM
Pee-Wee 0bama: “I meant to do that!”
CurtZHP on January 17, 2013 at 1:56 PM
2nd amendment?
Bmore on January 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM
But, but, but, sesqui declared “Victory!” yesterday???
Resist We Much on January 17, 2013 at 3:03 PM
Republicans won’t negotiate with him, so he plans to marshal popular opinion to force them into action.
Popular opinion? Americans *love* guns. The only gun control legislation they’re willing to get behind is stuff that’s already in place. All those “common sense” measures the Dems talk about have either already been implemented in all the states that want them or were tried and repealed.
The real gun ban they’d like to enact will never, ever happen now, thanks to decades of panic gun buying, and they know it. All the rest is theater. However unconstitutional and infuriating, none of the measures — including the old “assault weapon” ban — were anything more than a mild inconvenience.
S. Weasel on January 17, 2013 at 3:09 PM
Because he wants the issue for fundraising.
youtube downloader
Jurisprudence on January 17, 2013 at 3:12 PM