<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t overreact to Mali (or the hostages)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Country Boy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249156</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Country Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Let the Obama doctrine lead the way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah.  If we could just get the coward in chief to lead the way.  I won&#039;t say the rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let the Obama doctrine lead the way.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah.  If we could just get the coward in chief to lead the way.  I won&#8217;t say the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entagor</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249129</link>
		<dc:creator>entagor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;This should give further pause to anyone advocating major action on our part. We don’t know the territory, we don’t know the players, we don’t know who’s worth backing, and who’s not.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That never stopped the Obama WH before

What about those missing Americans? As can be seen from this article, the MSM is doing its best to tamp down coverage but the foreign press is not so cooperative. Every now and then a terror group decides to write its own copy. Bet the WH is searching the web daily in case some head cutting video makes it past the censors

I think it is time for Hillary to record another apology to the islamic world. She may not remember recording the last one, but they could give her a script. 

Obama could have utilized a hostage crisis before the election, but the gods decided to give him one pre innaugaration.

Bad luck. Obama had a wonderful gun control media blitz planned and a stupid hostage event threatens to take away from the stardust. Go figure]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This should give further pause to anyone advocating major action on our part. We don’t know the territory, we don’t know the players, we don’t know who’s worth backing, and who’s not.</p></blockquote>
<p>That never stopped the Obama WH before</p>
<p>What about those missing Americans? As can be seen from this article, the MSM is doing its best to tamp down coverage but the foreign press is not so cooperative. Every now and then a terror group decides to write its own copy. Bet the WH is searching the web daily in case some head cutting video makes it past the censors</p>
<p>I think it is time for Hillary to record another apology to the islamic world. She may not remember recording the last one, but they could give her a script. </p>
<p>Obama could have utilized a hostage crisis before the election, but the gods decided to give him one pre innaugaration.</p>
<p>Bad luck. Obama had a wonderful gun control media blitz planned and a stupid hostage event threatens to take away from the stardust. Go figure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baxter Greene</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249119</link>
		<dc:creator>Baxter Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;
Don’t overreact to Mali (or the hostages)&lt;/blockquote&gt;
...yes.... ignore the vast expansion and arming of al-qaeda mostly due to Obama&#039;s idiotic war with Libya....you know...
........because it doesn&#039;t make OBama look good.
Nothing to see here...
..just like there was nothing to worry about in Afghanistan up until 9/11.



&lt;blockquote&gt;

There is something of an “Obama doctrine” for these sorts of conflicts. On the one hand, it acknowledges the war on terror, the need to kill or capture certain bad guys, the importance of dismantling groups like al-Qaida and containing their expansion&lt;/blockquote&gt;

....and what has Obama got to show for over 4 years of the &quot;Obama doctrine???&quot;
...Egypt taken over by the muslim brotherhood....
.......losing the war in Afghanistan
..........launching a war in Libya without Congressional approval that has now led to the jihadist gaining more firepower and control of the surrounding area.
....Obama can&#039;t even provide sufficient security to our Consulates...as was the case in Libya which led to the deaths of an Ambassador and brave men who were left there to die. 
The bottom line is ....the jihadist are more powerful than ever under this so called &quot;Obama doctrine.&quot;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
 Instead, as stated in the official document that he and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta signed, the United States “will develop innovative, low-cost, small-footprint approaches to achieve our security objectives.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;
...what objectives?????
...........because if Obama&#039;s objectives is to &quot;dismantle al-qaeda&quot; and stop the jihadist threat they have failed miserably.


&lt;blockquote&gt;
And so there are many hot spots in the world where the Obama administration (sometimes President Obama himself) has ordered commando raids or drone strikes on “high-value targets.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...yes he has...and thank God he is just blowing them to pieces along with the civilians around them instead of pouring water on their faces like that eeeeeeeeevil Bush.&lt;blockquote&gt;

 In the case of Libya, he joined a NATO military campaign (which had been requested by the Arab League and authorized by the U.N. Security Council)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

....but chose not to go to the American people or seek approval through Congress.....you know....the checks and balances of the United States.
....so in the Hope and Change era....the Arab league decides when we go to war.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
This is what some uncharitably called “leading from behind,”&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
...of course flying the vast majority  of sorties....providing a Naval blockade....providing intelligence and hardware assets our NATO friends don&#039;t have room in their budgets for.....spending the first few weeks launching all of our missiles and other weaponry that no one else could provide ..and providing over 8,000 troops.....is &quot;not leading it&quot; in the minds of the &quot;smartest people in the room&quot;....


&lt;blockquote&gt;
and it proved successful.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

...you&#039;re joking with this right????
Glad to see liberals cheering on and claiming a smashing success launching a war of choice against an oil rich country that didn&#039;t attack us and posed no imminent threat.....that&#039;s some &lt;em&gt;hope and change&lt;/em&gt; right there.

 Just so we are straight on this....telling the American people more than a week after launching the Libyan war that it would be &quot;stupid to seek regime change&quot;...then turning around and tracking Gadaffi down like a dog.....
.....a war that has resulted in arming and strengthening jihadist groups like al-qaeda....
..........a war in a country that we cannot even set up Embassy&#039;s without our officials getting slaughtered.
.....a war that has helped al-qaeda gain major power all through North Africa.....set up major arms trafficking for the jihadist.....and now has helped establish terrorist training camps over hundreds of miles......

...is &quot;successful&quot;......
Well I bet Kaplan here must think Vietnam was a smashing success also by the looks of this idiotic spin he is putting on Libya.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Don’t overreact to Mali (or the hostages)</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;yes&#8230;. ignore the vast expansion and arming of al-qaeda mostly due to Obama&#8217;s idiotic war with Libya&#8230;.you know&#8230;<br />
&#8230;&#8230;..because it doesn&#8217;t make OBama look good.<br />
Nothing to see here&#8230;<br />
..just like there was nothing to worry about in Afghanistan up until 9/11.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There is something of an “Obama doctrine” for these sorts of conflicts. On the one hand, it acknowledges the war on terror, the need to kill or capture certain bad guys, the importance of dismantling groups like al-Qaida and containing their expansion</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;.and what has Obama got to show for over 4 years of the &#8220;Obama doctrine???&#8221;<br />
&#8230;Egypt taken over by the muslim brotherhood&#8230;.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;.losing the war in Afghanistan<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.launching a war in Libya without Congressional approval that has now led to the jihadist gaining more firepower and control of the surrounding area.<br />
&#8230;.Obama can&#8217;t even provide sufficient security to our Consulates&#8230;as was the case in Libya which led to the deaths of an Ambassador and brave men who were left there to die.<br />
The bottom line is &#8230;.the jihadist are more powerful than ever under this so called &#8220;Obama doctrine.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>
 Instead, as stated in the official document that he and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta signed, the United States “will develop innovative, low-cost, small-footprint approaches to achieve our security objectives.”</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;what objectives?????<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..because if Obama&#8217;s objectives is to &#8220;dismantle al-qaeda&#8221; and stop the jihadist threat they have failed miserably.</p>
<blockquote><p>
And so there are many hot spots in the world where the Obama administration (sometimes President Obama himself) has ordered commando raids or drone strikes on “high-value targets.”</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;yes he has&#8230;and thank God he is just blowing them to pieces along with the civilians around them instead of pouring water on their faces like that eeeeeeeeevil Bush.<br />
<blockquote>
<p> In the case of Libya, he joined a NATO military campaign (which had been requested by the Arab League and authorized by the U.N. Security Council)</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;.but chose not to go to the American people or seek approval through Congress&#8230;..you know&#8230;.the checks and balances of the United States.<br />
&#8230;.so in the Hope and Change era&#8230;.the Arab league decides when we go to war.</p>
<blockquote><p>
This is what some uncharitably called “leading from behind,”</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;of course flying the vast majority  of sorties&#8230;.providing a Naval blockade&#8230;.providing intelligence and hardware assets our NATO friends don&#8217;t have room in their budgets for&#8230;..spending the first few weeks launching all of our missiles and other weaponry that no one else could provide ..and providing over 8,000 troops&#8230;..is &#8220;not leading it&#8221; in the minds of the &#8220;smartest people in the room&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<blockquote><p>
and it proved successful.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;you&#8217;re joking with this right????<br />
Glad to see liberals cheering on and claiming a smashing success launching a war of choice against an oil rich country that didn&#8217;t attack us and posed no imminent threat&#8230;..that&#8217;s some <em>hope and change</em> right there.</p>
<p> Just so we are straight on this&#8230;.telling the American people more than a week after launching the Libyan war that it would be &#8220;stupid to seek regime change&#8221;&#8230;then turning around and tracking Gadaffi down like a dog&#8230;..<br />
&#8230;..a war that has resulted in arming and strengthening jihadist groups like al-qaeda&#8230;.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.a war in a country that we cannot even set up Embassy&#8217;s without our officials getting slaughtered.<br />
&#8230;..a war that has helped al-qaeda gain major power all through North Africa&#8230;..set up major arms trafficking for the jihadist&#8230;..and now has helped establish terrorist training camps over hundreds of miles&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;is &#8220;successful&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Well I bet Kaplan here must think Vietnam was a smashing success also by the looks of this idiotic spin he is putting on Libya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucano</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249093</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just heard we&#039;re sending a drone .
Also readying &quot; emergency response &quot; .
Fat chance !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just heard we&#8217;re sending a drone .<br />
Also readying &#8221; emergency response &#8221; .<br />
Fat chance !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucano</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249087</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We used to protect American citizens abroad .
Bet we don&#039;t hear anything for a long time .
H C to testify on Benghazi ? Oh , she&#039;s too busy .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used to protect American citizens abroad .<br />
Bet we don&#8217;t hear anything for a long time .<br />
H C to testify on Benghazi ? Oh , she&#8217;s too busy .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MelonCollie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249084</link>
		<dc:creator>MelonCollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Kind of like every day since 9/11.

BL@KBIRD on January 17, 2013 at 12:54 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Even before that. 

&quot;Hmm, now who should we finance to go after those evil Commies? I know! How about a bunch of barbaric head-chopping savages?&quot;

&quot;They&#039;ll turn on us sir, as sure as a scorpion stings. How about we just let them both kill each other and deal with whoever &#039;wins&#039; in that worthless pit?&quot;

&quot;*gasp* *sputter* What? That&#039;s downright UnAmerican!!!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kind of like every day since 9/11.</p>
<p>BL@KBIRD on January 17, 2013 at 12:54 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Even before that. </p>
<p>&#8220;Hmm, now who should we finance to go after those evil Commies? I know! How about a bunch of barbaric head-chopping savages?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;They&#8217;ll turn on us sir, as sure as a scorpion stings. How about we just let them both kill each other and deal with whoever &#8216;wins&#8217; in that worthless pit?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;*gasp* *sputter* What? That&#8217;s downright UnAmerican!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BL@KBIRD</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249075</link>
		<dc:creator>BL@KBIRD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;. We don’t know the territory, we don’t know the players, we don’t know who’s worth backing, and who’s not&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Kind of like every day since 9/11.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>. We don’t know the territory, we don’t know the players, we don’t know who’s worth backing, and who’s not</p></blockquote>
<p>Kind of like every day since 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Benson</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249069</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That terribly &quot;uncharitable&quot; formulation (&quot;leading from behind&quot;) is based on a &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/RyanLizza/status/129581657534644224&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;direct quote&lt;/a&gt; from...an Obama White House official.  But damn these mean-spirited critics!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That terribly &#8220;uncharitable&#8221; formulation (&#8220;leading from behind&#8221;) is based on a <a href="https://twitter.com/RyanLizza/status/129581657534644224" rel="nofollow">direct quote</a> from&#8230;an Obama White House official.  But damn these mean-spirited critics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddevil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249058</link>
		<dc:creator>reddevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t overreact when US citizens are possibly killed by guns overseas, but overreact when US citizens are killed by guns here in the US?  Got it Fred.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t overreact when US citizens are possibly killed by guns overseas, but overreact when US citizens are killed by guns here in the US?  Got it Fred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelo</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/17/dont-overreact-to-mali-or-the-hostages/comment-page-1/#comment-2249057</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=238434#comment-2249057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, ignore none of that would have happened without Obama&#039;s UNILATERAL decision to intervene in Libya (You know how many requests we get to intervene SOMEWHERE every month??  The word NO works; and if not &#039;No&#039;, CHECK WITH CONGRESS!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, ignore none of that would have happened without Obama&#8217;s UNILATERAL decision to intervene in Libya (You know how many requests we get to intervene SOMEWHERE every month??  The word NO works; and if not &#8216;No&#8217;, CHECK WITH CONGRESS!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>