U.S. weighs military support for France’s campaign against Mali militants
The Obama administration is considering significant military backing for France’s drive against al-Qaeda-linked militants in Mali, but its support for a major ally could test U.S. legal boundaries and stretch counterterrorism resources in a murky new conflict.
The United States is already providing surveillance and other intelligence help to France and may soon offer military support such as transport or refueling planes, according to U.S. officials, who stressed that any assistance would stop short of sending American combat forces to the volatile West African nation. …
Direct military aid to Mali is forbidden under U.S. law because the weak rump government there seized power in a coup. U.S. moves are further complicated by uncertainty about which militants would be targeted in an assault.
The loosely affiliated web of Malian militants in the country’s north includes members of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). But other fighters are longtime foes of the Malian government and pose no direct threat to U.S. interests.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Remember people, Iraq was compaired to the Vietnam War a lot. However Mali seems like more of a repeat than what happen in Iraq.
BigGator5 on January 16, 2013 at 10:07 AM
There are no murky new conflicts, only globalist housekeeping.
roy_batty on January 16, 2013 at 10:07 AM
Aw yes, the never ending war. Are we ever going to mind our own business?
MoreLiberty on January 16, 2013 at 10:16 AM
I’ll wait for all the antiwar marches to start before I get really involved in this, you know, the protests decrying “American Imperial aggression against another nation” stuff that was so popular last decade.
Bishop on January 16, 2013 at 10:16 AM
legal boundaries? Thanks for the laugh.
rbj on January 16, 2013 at 10:21 AM
Ayeah that makes two of us. As the Democrats amply showed, they were more than willing to buy into nearly every ‘reason’ used to invade Iraq when such thoughts were popular – and before it looked like we were actually going to go to war.
But once the “go” orders were given, they changed their tune SO FAST.
MelonCollie on January 16, 2013 at 10:24 AM
Did the French run out of white surrender flags and need more?
albill on January 16, 2013 at 10:25 AM
Let us recall the battle of Dien Bien Phu in Vietnam opening the door for great U.S. envolvement.
filetandrelease on January 16, 2013 at 11:03 AM
That Bushitler, he’s such a warmonger.. we need Ear Leader to lead US into the Golden Dawn of a newtopia…
Oh. Wait…
DStreete on January 16, 2013 at 11:11 AM
No, no and more no. Mali is the last place we need to be. Guess those nasty Islamist’s haven’t gotten the memo yet that they are on the run.
major dad on January 16, 2013 at 12:11 PM