Congress’s Constitution problem: Too many legislators don’t understand it
The Washington Times studied 3,764 bills introduced in the first year and found some patterns in the authority statements: The most commonly cited authority was Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, which establishes Congress‘ power to tax and spend “for the common defense and general welfare.” Close behind, however, was the commerce clause — Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 — which has come under fire by many conservatives for being stretched well beyond the Founding Founders’ intent.
Lawmakers cited 70 authorities, including 56 bills under the 10th Amendment, which reserves powers to the states rather than to Congress, and 12 under the Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms.
“The thing that jumped out is how many parts of the Constitution members of Congress seem to think grant them legislative authority,” said Doug Kendall, founder of the Constitutional Accountability Center. “I wouldn’t have thought the 10th Amendment, which is not about legislating, or the First Amendment, which says ‘Congress shall make no law,’ would be fertile ground for legislative authority.”
Like Mr. Spalding, he said the reality has fallen short of its drafters’ hopes.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
The problem is too many people don’t understand Thomas Hobbes. The Constitution is a direct refutation of Leviathan. Not just the political philosophy in it either, the whole worldview.
The Patriot Act, Obamacare, and a great deal of the regulatory code draw on a Hobbesean view of human nature and the world, and are inconsistent with the Constitution not just legally but metaphysically as well.
Everybody needs a lesson, not just on the Constitution, but on the philosophical debates that led up to it.
Atlas on January 15, 2013 at 10:45 PM
They need to read John Locke.
Mimzey on January 15, 2013 at 10:54 PM
I am really glad I went to a Lutheran School they made us read all that stuff. It was required learning. It is illegal – but I have only been told you have to vote them out if it offends me, that can not be the only answer to politicians (our workers) that don’t follow the constitution. There has to be a a way to impeach them. Honestly there does.
mnkatie on January 15, 2013 at 11:00 PM
They need to read the Constitution.
malclave on January 15, 2013 at 11:01 PM
Honest to God, the problem is apathy. Too much of it around. They don’t care, and your neighbor either doesn’t care, or doesn’t get it. Being American means always being free to them. They do not get that it can be taken away.
CycloneCDB on January 15, 2013 at 11:12 PM
That’s not Congress, that’s the electorate. Congress may not care about freedom or good policy, but they care about pleasing their constituents.
The electorate couldn’t be bothered to turn out with the purpose of changing the dynamics of Capitol Hill (I think a good turnout could have delivered both Houses of Congress and the Presidency to either party), and yet they demand solutions from divided government on these issues. Not just any solutions: they want a long-term balanced budget with lower taxes and no real cuts to any big money-sinks.
I think the Congresscritters as individuals are doing a relatively decent job. Their representing the electorate.
Atlas on January 15, 2013 at 11:22 PM
They pass laws because they can pass laws. They don’t think beforehand about the constitutionality of the laws — that only matters if things go too far in front of a court.
And, courts have to be pushed pretty far to find something unconstitutional. They’ll give the government every benefit of the doubt before striking something down.
Check out this oral argument recap from a case currently in front of SCOTUS — http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/01/argument-recap-an-ever-shrinking-takings-claim/
Petitioner starts out with a credible takings claim, which the justices apparently get uneasy about, not because of the legal merits of the position, apparently, but because of the fear that finding for the petitioner would just end up causing the government more trouble when it regulates in the future.
Revenant on January 15, 2013 at 11:26 PM
I remember reading a Star Trek novel years ago where the author described some of the features of Vulcan’s government. She included one branch of government whose sole purpose was to repeal laws.
Sounds logical to me.
/geek
malclave on January 15, 2013 at 11:35 PM
I think it’s funny how these people say, “Read the constitution, read the Constitution!” What good is reading the Constitution if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the Constitution?
The Rogue Tomato on January 15, 2013 at 11:51 PM
Oh, and I’m referring to the 1,000 page Constitution printed with a REALLY BIG FONT.
The Rogue Tomato on January 16, 2013 at 12:14 AM
rogerb on January 16, 2013 at 6:10 AM