Why Scott Brown might run for governor, not Senate
Even if Brown were to win an expected late spring special election for the Senate — he would enter as a favorite — he’d have to pick up and do it all over again next year, in a higher-turnout contest that could also be tough to win. A loss in that race could end his political career.
That all makes for a wrenching decision for Brown: To make another run at Capitol Hill or hold off for the chance to reign over Beacon Hill. Sources tell POLITICO he has not made up his mind.
“My sense is that Scott has a good chance of succeeding if he decides to enter the special,” said Republican National Committeewoman Kerry Healey, who served as Romney’s lieutenant governor. “However, there’s a lot of appeal to waiting for the governor’s seat. … There are opportunities in both.”
The tug of history is toward a gubernatorial run: Bay State Republicans simply fare much better running for state offices than federal offices. Republicans, including Romney, held the governorship from 1991 to 2007. When Brown won the late Ted Kennedy’s seat in a January 2010 special election against Attorney General Martha Coakley — who ran what many observers consider one of the most incompetent campaigns in modern political history — he became the first Massachusetts Republican elected to the Senate since 1972.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Meh. Massachusetts.
BigGator5 on January 14, 2013 at 8:52 AM
How about going and getting a real job? There is nothing special about you Mr. Brown, you and your liberalism lite won’t save America.
Flange on January 14, 2013 at 8:54 AM
Whichever pays the most, and has the most power, and is easiest to win…
right2bright on January 14, 2013 at 8:56 AM
Dude…are we supposed to fall for this…?
If you don’t want Brown in the Senate then just say so but this Jedi mind trick to make him run for governor is lame.
NeoKong on January 14, 2013 at 8:59 AM
He’s a practicing real estate attorney, but you knew that.
And in a state that routinely elects people to office that are to the left of former members of the Soviet Politburo, I think I’ll vote for Mr. Brown whenever I can.
Geez…
turfmann on January 14, 2013 at 8:59 AM
Translation: Please run for Gov!
SAZMD on January 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM
Eh, another guy who got a taste for the public trough and will never leave. Charlie H. Crist of the North.
Bishop on January 14, 2013 at 9:27 AM
He knows that the Tea Party won’t come out with the financial or logistical support for him anymore.
njrob on January 14, 2013 at 9:48 AM
Did you mean he was a practicing real estate attorney? For the last few years he’s been either campaigning or a Senator, but you knew that. And he may not be to the left of the Soviet politburo, but guess what, you’re still voting for a socialist.
But the point I was making is that his choice isn’t between running for Senate or Governor. He could actually go back to the private sector.
Flange on January 14, 2013 at 9:59 AM
I’m not privy to the contents of his Day-Timer but last I saw him speaking on the subject he used the present tense of the verb. And considering how long the last real estate closing I attended took, I think he can still squeeze in a few here and there.
And I am pretty sure that has been the case throughout his political/legal career. He works out of his house and balancing a law practice with being a selectman/representative/senator/senator seem to be his gig.
Considering the number of moonbats inhabiting this state, clogging up the highways with Priuses festooned with all manner of progressively sanctimonious bumper stickers going exactly the speed limit because of their guilt at ruining the planet, Scott Freakin’ Brown is the least of our problems.
At the very least he has an (R) after his name.
turfmann on January 14, 2013 at 10:46 AM
And that’s where we differ. The truth is, as horrible as the democrats are, we had a debt and spending problem when the Republicans had control of both houses and the Presidency. This current administration just put the decline into overdrive.
Flange on January 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM