Attendance likely to drop by a million for Obama’s second inauguration
The expected drop in attendance isn’t a sign for a lack of enthusiasm for Obama’s re-election, according to Lyman and others. With the historic novelty of the first inaugural gone, coupled with today’s challenging economy, polarized political climate, minimum stay requirements imposed by some Washington-area hotels, and images of people shivering in the bone-chilling cold during the 2009 swearing-in still fresh in the minds of many, more people are choosing to stay home and watch the event on television, they say.
“People are very excited about Obama being re-elected, but not excited about going to D.C. and enduring the cold like the last time,” Lyman said. “Some of it could be financial. Some people overspent over the holidays and I know some people’s job status changed in the last four years.”
David Goldfield, a history professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, said this year’s inaugural seems to lack the buzz and sense of anticipation that Obama’s first one had.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Tokens are boring.
CW on January 14, 2013 at 8:30 PM
So…the stink is off the turd.
catmman on January 14, 2013 at 8:32 PM
Ahhh bummer. Must not have put the moocher travel budget in the fiscal cliff deal.
gophergirl on January 14, 2013 at 8:35 PM
You’re misquoting. It’s drop a million to attend Obama’s second inauguration.
rogerb on January 14, 2013 at 8:40 PM
Attendance at Bark’s 2017 inauguration will be compulsory.
Imagine the pomp; hundreds of smiling kids holding up placards that when put together display Bark’s face, a long line of goose-stepping soldiers and ICBM-carrying trucks passing in review, overeager Party apparatchiks fawning over Dear Leader.
Yessir, it will be quite the show.
Bishop on January 14, 2013 at 8:42 PM
Considering the mall was a complete garbage disaster in 2009…
Perhaps it will cost us taxpayers less to clean up after all the Obama slobs this year. What is it about Obama voters and litter, trash?
marybel on January 14, 2013 at 8:47 PM
Who wants to watch a profligate liar lie again?
tom daschle concerned on January 14, 2013 at 9:11 PM
I work about a block from the National Mall. Thank the Lord I will be on vacation no that day of shame.
NavyMustang on January 14, 2013 at 9:14 PM
Can’t the fans spend their EBT funds to attend?
onlineanalyst on January 14, 2013 at 9:21 PM
Spin.
INC on January 14, 2013 at 9:24 PM
Well, his vote total was artificially inflated by a couple million so it’s a “wash”. No harm, no foul.
Clink on January 14, 2013 at 9:30 PM
Is that how a lying man spins it? Some overspent on the holidays, instead of planning ahead to attend? As for the changing job status that you know of, would it entail unemployment and/or going on disability? Fancy that, people unable to attrend due to cost, even if they wanted to. Shocka!!!
AH_C on January 14, 2013 at 9:34 PM
CHANGE!
Mr. Prodigy on January 14, 2013 at 9:51 PM
His appeal is just becoming more selective.
Good Lt on January 14, 2013 at 9:57 PM
And some of it could be that he stole the election and nobody really gives a sh*t about him anymore.
The Rogue Tomato on January 14, 2013 at 10:15 PM
You know what could top the Obama’s inaugurations attendance? the march for life on jan 25th..that would be amazing
sadsushi on January 15, 2013 at 10:49 PM