“This is the neocons’ worst nightmare”
“This is the neocons’ worst nightmare because you’ve got a combat soldier, successful businessman and senator who actually thinks there may be other ways to resolve some questions other than force,” said Richard L. Armitage, who broke with the more hawkish members of the Bush team during the Iraq war when he was a deputy to Secretary of State Colin L. Powell…
In fact, the neoconservatives have done anything but disappear. In the years since the war’s messy end, the most hawkish promoters have maintained enormous sway within the Republican Party, holding leading advisory posts in both the McCain and Romney presidential campaigns as their counterparts in the “realist” wing of the party, epitomized by Mr. Powell, gravitated toward Barack Obama…
“Here was a Republican with national security credentials saying that the Republican president was being irresponsible on national security — that’s potent,” said Kenneth L. Adelman, a member of the Defense Policy Review Board at the time and a frequent sparring partner with Mr. Hagel on television. “It drove me up the wall not so much that he was Republican, because I didn’t care that much from a political point of view — I thought the substance of his arguments were just wrong and unfounded.”
Mr. Hagel’s earliest concerns arose before the Congressional vote authorizing the use of force. “You can take the country into a war pretty fast,” he said in an interview with The New York Times in 2002, “but you can’t get us out as quickly, and the public needs to know what the risks are.” In the interview, he took a swipe at Mr. Perle, then one of the most visible promoters of the war, saying, “Maybe Mr. Perle would like to be in the first wave of those who go into Baghdad.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Armitage? What rock has been under in the past couple years?
rob verdi on January 13, 2013 at 12:32 PM
Ah, yes, Armitage, the man who actually leaked about Valerie Plame to Robert Novak.
And a former Colin Powell flunky.
Twp reasons not to listen to a word he says.
Wethal on January 13, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Actually, if Hagel gets confirmed, he will only prove neoconservatives right.
thebrokenrattle on January 13, 2013 at 12:37 PM
Was exactly my first thought.
Patrick Ishmael on January 13, 2013 at 12:37 PM
We’re still using the term “neocons”?
BKeyser on January 13, 2013 at 12:37 PM
So McCain and Romney are the hawkish right wing of the Republican party and Barack Obama is the pragmatic side of the Republican party?
trubble on January 13, 2013 at 12:39 PM
So long as they throw around terms like “isolationist” (applicable to nobody here except Dumb-te and a few obvious sockpuppet users), terms like “NeoCon” are fair game.
But…to be completely fair to them, all but the hopelessly hardheaded have figured out that an occupation with impossible goals and run by a Marxist manchild is never going to work.
MelonCollie on January 13, 2013 at 12:42 PM
We’re not. The Left is.
That word is so 9/10 it’s not even funny any more.
Del Dolemonte on January 13, 2013 at 12:53 PM
Wasn’t he absolutely right?
libfreeordie on January 13, 2013 at 12:55 PM
You mean, like “smart power”?
yubley on January 13, 2013 at 12:59 PM
libfreeordie,
and he along with Clinton, Biden, and Kerry voted to send everyone in. By the way does this advice apply to Libya as well?
rob verdi on January 13, 2013 at 1:00 PM
Using the word “neocon” allows him to avoid Hagel’s term “the Jewish lobby.”
Attila (Pillage Idiot) on January 13, 2013 at 1:00 PM
No that honor is still held by Obama.
Armitage is more like a brain fart
So? When has that fact NOT been true? That’s hardly a Eureka! moment. It’s common knowledge and has been a fact of warfare since time began.
HotAirian on January 13, 2013 at 1:03 PM
Iraq or Libya? Which one successfully overthrew a dictator and left democracy and a functioning economy in its wake?
Grunt on January 13, 2013 at 1:09 PM
rob verdi, I don’t support the Libya mission. I’m anti imperialism regardless of party ID.
libfreeordie on January 13, 2013 at 1:21 PM
What would be effective is to bus some concerned voters from NY (preferably those with family in Israel) to DC. Have about 100 or so, and have them go to Schumer’s office. They would politely express their opposition to Chuck Hagel. Then they would go to Gilibrand’s office and express their opposition. Last they would go to their Representative’s office and urge them to put pressure on the NY Senator’s to oppose Hagel.
Grace Meng made it clear in the campaign she was a friend of Israel, let’s see if she actually stands by it.
Schumer also knows the visual of 100+ people opposing Hagel is something remarkable. The pictures have the potential to go viral in the media environment, especially given the media’s perceived importance for NY.
amazingmets on January 13, 2013 at 1:22 PM
Their worst nightmare? Wouldn’t that be more like Iran nuking Israel out of existence and setting off nukes in US cities? This seems pretty friggin’ tame compared to that. But, hey, this is the NYT.
besser tot als rot on January 13, 2013 at 1:28 PM
And didn’t come forward to spare Scooter Libby.
John the Libertarian on January 13, 2013 at 1:30 PM
I think the neocons’ worst nightmare came long ago when the reality of the debt, the public’s stomach for fighting, and the election of Obama put an end to most ambitions for spreading American influence among the benighted regions of the world.
It’s nice that we’re now apparently back to using “neocon” as an actual word that means something instead of “conservative, but with the prefix neo- which sounds like neo-Nazi.”
HitNRun on January 13, 2013 at 1:37 PM
Yep, my advice to my kids still stands the test of time: if you want to see what the editor doesn’t want to mention but can’t leave out while making his counter-arguments, just go to the last paragraph.
drunyan8315 on January 13, 2013 at 1:41 PM
This is pretty accurate. They still want to be in Afcr@pistan forever, but they’re starting to understand that when you can’t afford your war, the public won’t back you, and the POTUS is a complete idiot, there’s just no possible path to victory.
Armitage’s influence is little more than icing on the lemon cake, frankly.
MelonCollie on January 13, 2013 at 2:24 PM
So a coward who let some other poor soul burn for his deed.
Pass.
kim roy on January 13, 2013 at 3:25 PM