How Hugo Chavez destroyed Venezuela
Venezuela’s biggest robberies are carried out by Chavez and his supporters, under the color of law. In 2008, the Venezuelan legislature opened investigations into claims that two of Chavez’s brothers acquired at least 17 ranches at knock-down prices, using front men and concealed names. The investigation was soon abandoned, however: The 2010 elections were boycotted by opposition parties to protest new rigged rules, and Chavez’s own party gained a super-majority that put an end to all awkward questioning.
Yet people around Chavez continued to amass fortunes from confiscated lands and enterprises — and from the opportunities for fees and other benefits in the state-controlled oil sector that sustains Venezuela’s otherwise dilapidated economy. It is this enriched inner circle that will attempt to sustain Chavez-style rule after Chavez’s demise.
For all the talk about Chavez’s “socialist revolution,” his regime rests, caudillo-style, on the backing of corrupt, drug-dealing generals. Henry Silva Rangel, appointed minister of defense in January 2012, was one of four senior Chavez associates named by the U.S. government in 2008 as Foreign Narcotics Kingpins (yes, that’s the actual title). In a 2010 interview, Rangel warned that the army would not allow the Chavez “revolution” to be voted out of office. Rangel maintains a tight working relationship with another Chavez brother, Adnan, who succeeded Chavez’s father as governor of the family’s home state of Barinas.
Despite vast oil wealth, the Venezuelan economy has tumbled into terrible straits.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I blame intransigent Republicans, for not compromising & refusing to moderate.
JFKY on January 12, 2013 at 7:52 PM
Socialism and dictatorship?
catmman on January 12, 2013 at 7:52 PM
So it’s not Bush’s fault ?
Daayyummm….
burrata on January 12, 2013 at 7:57 PM
No Cattman, it’s an article by a “David” the problem MUST be immoderate Republicans…
JFKY on January 12, 2013 at 7:59 PM
Fancy that. They must be beside themselves watching los Estados Unidos openly discuss letting them sell their wares on the street.
MelonCollie on January 12, 2013 at 7:59 PM
Whose going to break the news to Frum that his boyfriend Barry is on the same trajectory?
Kataklysmic on January 12, 2013 at 8:02 PM
I thought you liked that kind of thing, Fatty McButterpants.
rdbrewer on January 12, 2013 at 8:04 PM
We’ll be saying the same thing about American economy in 2014.
IF we are even allowed to say it.
Or anything else
burrata on January 12, 2013 at 8:04 PM
I’d attribute it more to profligate spending, price controls, and nationalizations than to hypocrisy. The hypocrisy just means there aren’t good intentions behind the bad policies.
theperfecteconomist on January 12, 2013 at 8:07 PM
See also: B. Hussein Obama, Robert Mugabe
tom daschle concerned on January 12, 2013 at 8:20 PM
Obysmal’s tutor?
onlineanalyst on January 12, 2013 at 8:46 PM
Sounds just like the robbery by Obama of the citizens of the US through his “stimulus”, “green energy”, and automaker “bailout” programs, doesn’t it?
Barack Obama’s administration is the largest perpetrated theft in the history of the world. Chavez is the same thing on a smaller scale. Obama is hundreds of billions.
crosspatch on January 12, 2013 at 9:26 PM
*double take*
Is this the same David Frum?
BigGator5 on January 13, 2013 at 8:23 AM