Biden 2016?
So why do we keep having to remind ourselves to include him in the ‘16 mix? There are two obvious reasons. The first is age: Biden turned 70 last month, meaning that if he runs in the next election, he’ll be 73 during the campaign and 74 on his inauguration – meaning he’d be the oldest person ever to be sworn in as president. (Ronald Reagan didn’t turn 74 until a few weeks after his second inaugural.)
This was enough to create an impression from the moment Biden joined Obama’s ticket in 2008 that V.P. would be his career-capping role, a perception Biden has been trying (to the degree he can while remaining a loyal No. 2) to shake off. The good news for Biden is that age probably isn’t quite the obstacle it used to be. In 1952, for instance, Alben Barkley, Harry Truman’s 74-year-old V.P., believed he was next in line for the Democratic presidential nomination and badly wanted it, only to be bluntly told by party leaders that he was too old. Six decades later, the stigma has probably faded – especially for a septuagenarian like Biden, who has the energy and sharpness of someone many years younger. On the whole, Biden’s age complicates his ’16 ambition but doesn’t by itself kill it.
The other reason Biden is overlooked is more serious: Hillary. The outgoing secretary of state, if she chooses to run, has the potential to be a primary season front-runner like we’ve never before seen.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Vomit!
OldEnglish on January 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM
Snowball’s chance…
petefrt on January 12, 2013 at 11:01 AM
So much for clean and articulate.
Flange on January 12, 2013 at 11:01 AM
Hillary/Biden.
?
Heh
CW on January 12, 2013 at 11:03 AM
The excerpt gives the two reasons Kornacki comes up with. The whole thing never mentions that a third reason might be his chronic habit of saying and doing stupid things that make him the butt of jokes. In fairness, Kornacki may reasonably assume that the media would stop reporting on these things if Biden runs.
Karl on January 12, 2013 at 11:03 AM
I used to say, “Oh, pretty please, run that wacko,” but then this country elected Zero as its president — twice. The dems could run Hugo Chavez, and he’d win in a landslide. The next president will be a democrat. And the one after that. And the one after that. Lots more pain will be required before the sheeple make a change, and by that point, the Constitution will be a memory, and change will be impossible…without…well, you know.
Rational Thought on January 12, 2013 at 11:03 AM
fixed
Lost in Jersey on January 12, 2013 at 11:04 AM
uh YEAH? No.
44Magnum on January 12, 2013 at 11:07 AM
“Biden 2016: Because at this point no one could **** things up any worse!”
inviolet on January 12, 2013 at 11:14 AM
Sure. Either the GOP runs a decent conservative or it loses to the least qualified.
Are we a republic or a kakistocracy? Lately, I’m not sure of the answer.
platypus on January 12, 2013 at 11:15 AM
Biden/Hillary 2016
“Spread your legs, you’re going to be frisked.”
Fallon on January 12, 2013 at 11:17 AM
The follow up to:
Obama/Biden 2008
“Gird your loins.”
Fallon on January 12, 2013 at 11:18 AM
Not in the run-up to the primaries. The media is all-in on the idea that the Democrats have a lock on 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. if they can just keep playing the special interest group card, which is why they’re already in orgasms over the idea of Hillary! ’16.
If she’s giving all indications by the start of 2015 she’s going to make a run, and if there are no other women/minority/sexual preference/whatever viable candidates on the horizon, look for the media to suddenly start treating Biden like a (gasp!) Republican and retroactively detailing all his gaffes and bizarre statements in lurid detail as a way of making sure he either doesn’t run, or is a true national joke even for the low information voters by the time the primaries roll around.
jon1979 on January 12, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Progressives: “Release the Biden”.
I really do hope the democrats are stupid enough to nominate him.
William Eaton on January 12, 2013 at 11:29 AM
If Hillary doesn’t run, then the Republican candidate probably wins just based on the law of “eight years.”
Illinidiva on January 12, 2013 at 11:32 AM
I think the Republicans fear a Biden run for presidency more than any other potential candidate. He is remarkable charming and warm to womynz(tm)he recently meets and always appears super duper smart on virtually every topic. He experience of riding trains and shopping in Home Depot are additional things the Republican fear. Please, please, I beg of you to not run such an intelligent and qualified candidate for president. We are doomed if Biden runs!
Sincerely,
Republican Party
trs on January 12, 2013 at 11:48 AM
rogerb on January 12, 2013 at 11:56 AM
My thoughts exactly. I still can’t believe that this idiot was reelected with Mr. Gafftastic as his VP. Now that two improbable events have come to pass in 2012, all bets are off in terms of trusting the American people to think and behave rationally.
El Salsero on January 12, 2013 at 12:57 PM
Like she wasn’t the frontrunner in 2008, hmmmm? My, my. What short memories we have in this country. And we’re trending towards legalizing marijuana, too? I hope I’m dead before full blown retardness sets in here.
El Salsero on January 12, 2013 at 1:01 PM
Same poison. Depends on whether you’d prefer it packaged in hair plugs or a pantsuit.
fitzfong on January 12, 2013 at 1:07 PM
One word: Benghazi. That is toxic to either of them.
karenhasfreedom on January 12, 2013 at 1:50 PM