The meaning of Hagel
So what’s going on? Message sending. Obama won reelection. He no longer has to trim, to appear more moderate than his true instincts. He has the “flexibility” to be authentically Obama.
Hence the Hagel choice: Under the guise of centrist bipartisanship, it allows the president to leave the constrained first-term Obama behind and follow his natural Hagel-like foreign-policy inclinations. On three pressing issues in particular:
Military Spending
Current defense secretary Leon Panetta said in August 2011 that the scheduled automatic $600 billion defense cuts (“sequestration”) would result in “hollowing out the force,” which would be “devastating.” And he strongly hinted that he might resign rather than enact them.
Asked about Panetta’s remarks, Hagel called the Pentagon “bloated” and needing “to be pared down.” Just the man you’d want to carry out a U.S. disarmament that would shrink America to what Obama thinks is its proper size on the world stage, i.e., smaller. The overweening superpower that Obama promiscuously chided in his global we-have-sinned tour is poised for reduction, not only to fund the bulging welfare state but to recalibrate America’s proper role in the world.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Dreams of Obama’s father, nightmares to U.S..
Obama wants U.S. to know how much he hates U.S..
Facts do count.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on January 11, 2013 at 1:55 PM
Gut the military and abandon Israel too. It’s “bipartisan” now.
forest on January 11, 2013 at 2:09 PM
“Balanced Approach” !!
Paul-Cincy on January 11, 2013 at 2:11 PM
Good for Hagel, Obama, and the Democrats if this turns out to be true. At least that are making a specific proposal to cut something from the Federal budget(unlike Republicans).
antifederalist on January 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM
I had to laugh at that … you’re right.
HondaV65 on January 11, 2013 at 3:09 PM
One would expect that a baseline subtracting the faux “costs” of two fully-loaded “wars” ad infinitum and adding tech and other spending to be continued under other budget headings, a “deep” “cut” will yield yet another increase.
kunegetikos on January 11, 2013 at 3:24 PM