Defense spending can and should be cut — in the right way
For example, the Pentagon is building several versions of the F-35 fighter plane. Models specific for the Navy and the Marines have been “plagued by cost overruns and schedule delays, and are now estimated to cost just under $200 million each,” according to a report by Taxpayers for Common Sense. Replacing the two extra models of the basic F-35 with the F/A-18 fighter — ending up with the same total number of planes, but a combination of F-35s and F/A-18s — could save about $61 billion over the next decade.
Then there is health care. Coburn wants TRICARE, the military health care system, to require greater out-of-pocket payments from retired soldiers who were not in any way disabled by their service and are not yet eligible for Medicare. Their out-of-pocket expenses have been basically unchanged since 1995, while health care costs have risen dramatically. Making that change and a few others in TRICARE, Coburn estimates, could save more than $180 billion in the next decade.
Then there is outside services contracting, a practice that has nearly tripled in cost since 2000.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Oh, “in the right way” … of course.
Jeddite on January 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM
Oh Byron, you mischievous little prankster. Trying to pre-empt the donkeys.
Trust me — everything is getting cut by inflation. So doing nothing is actually doing something good.
platypus on January 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM
It’s strange that after years and years of polling often showing public favor for “across-the-board cuts” that when it’s finally going to happen, it’s suddenly the worst possible way to do cuts. Everything is bloated due to perpetual increases on baseline budgets, and the GOP and the Dems are at odds at what is a “good program” (e.g. GOP favoring a big Navy, Dems not), so politically the best form of cuts are across-the-board cuts. Heck, considering how hard it is to eliminate “bad programs,” just cut the budget a lot and then restore funding to the best programs as needed.
theperfecteconomist on January 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM
We need a much smaller Army and Marine corp…too much chance for misuse by Obama and others like him. Maintain a strong Navy & Air Force. Fortress America, baby. Plus it will make it harder to go on foreign boondoggles.
fastphil101 on January 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM
Every part of government is inefficient. It is unavoidable. So there needs to be vigilance to cut out the waste and reform programs greater than 5 years old. Sunsetting should be more commonplace than it is. Coburn has upset me about taxes, but Republicans should take serious his ideas of cutting defense because it gives us the high ground when other areas are discussed.
Donald Draper on January 11, 2013 at 7:04 PM
they need to be careful in cutting “the domestic grocery stores”
these are bennies that keep people in – oh wait – we want to cut manpower …
but when you sh*t on people and they get out … do note expect them
to come running back when you need them …
conservative tarheel on January 11, 2013 at 7:25 PM
Gee Byron why do you think the Pentagon hadn’t thought of that already? Hell, if they really wanted to save cash they could head over to AZ and take a bunch of planes out of mothball and they could have the same number of planes without having to buy any new ones at all!
lexhamfox on January 11, 2013 at 7:29 PM
Eliminate cost-plus contracts. Contractors have no incentive to be efficient and end up manipulating accounting practices to bill the government for as much overhead as possible.
DaveO on January 11, 2013 at 7:48 PM
Look at all of the money saved by not building a Death Star.
RINOs are people too on January 11, 2013 at 9:12 PM
Au contraire. The interest on our debt isn’t going to get cut by inflation…
JohnGalt23 on January 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM