Why the Benghazi investigation is going nowhere
Yet the political furor, which now threatens to hold up President Obama’s national security nominations, stands in stark contrast to the response in Libya itself. There, Libyans say, the investigation is nonoperational, if not effectively dead, with witnesses too fearful to talk and key police officers targeted for violent retribution. “There is no Libyan investigation. No, no, no,” says Mohamed Buisier, a political activist in Benghazi, who returned home in 2011 after decades in the U.S. “There is not even a will to investigate anything. Even for us civilians, it is very dangerous if you talk about this subject.”
The growing sense that the culprits in the Sept. 11, 2012 attack might never be caught deepened this week, when Tunisian officials released the sole suspect in custody. Citing lack of evidence, they freed Ali al-Harzi, a Tunisian citizen, though he is still restricted from traveling outside the four governorates surrounding Tunis. Harzi was arrested in Turkey shortly after the consulate attack, and deported to his home country, finally agreeing last month to a three-hour interrogation by FBI agents in Tunis, according to his lawyer Anour Ouled Ali. “He denied everything,” Ali told TIME on Thursday, by phone from Tunis. “He told the FBI he was not involved at all.”
Whoever knows differently is for now not talking. And in fact, they might be dead or missing.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Because Obama is obstructing it?
Nah, couldn’t be!
wildcat72 on January 10, 2013 at 11:06 PM
TIME magazine.
We report. We decide.
…….. wink to Baracky
fogw on January 10, 2013 at 11:11 PM
America is in anarchy. Thank you ignoramuses. Thank you democrat voters. Thank you hedonists and sodomites.
May you all languish in agony forever and ever.
tom daschle concerned on January 10, 2013 at 11:17 PM
Why? Too many dead witnesses. They should be flogged for this.
Bmore on January 10, 2013 at 11:19 PM
Bah. The “Benghazi investigation” isn’t about what’s going on in Libya or what law enforcement action the government can or can’t accomplish against the terrorists. The investigation is about who in this lawless Administration is responsible for letting four Americans get killed so they can be sent to Guantanamo, where they belong.
Here’s hoping they push too far on gun control.
Dusty on January 10, 2013 at 11:25 PM
The investigation is going nowhere because Hill and Bill want to run for POTUS in 2016.
Dead Americans mean nothing. Our right to know what happened means nothing.
We’re all on hold. Nothing matters beyond the Clintons’ political aspirations.
Hillary took a waxing from the Dems in 2008. She, typically, gave the boss a blow job, took a back seat, enabled another loser, rode around the world at our expense pretending to be SoS, and now thinks she should be president.
The Dems. The Clintons. A Scourge on this country.
My Gawd. Hillary is like a yeast infection that has no cure.
Cody1991 on January 10, 2013 at 11:30 PM
A corrupt, lawless regime.
That desperately wants to take the guns of law-abiding citizens who will be the last stand against tyranny.
Connect the dots.
justltl on January 10, 2013 at 11:34 PM
Remember that Obama wants to create a civilian army equal to the military?
What’s that going to be for?
This is all still a little hard to believe, but it’s all really happening, isn’t it?
justltl on January 10, 2013 at 11:39 PM
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.”- Obama
justltl on January 10, 2013 at 11:42 PM
Well, that’s not at all ominous or anything.
theperfecteconomist on January 10, 2013 at 11:46 PM
I think BO is going to find that there is already one in place. What he doesn’t know (as with most topics) is that it exists without his efforts.
We’ll see who wins.
Cody1991 on January 10, 2013 at 11:48 PM
Okay, I totally don’t get the “reasoning” that TIME thinks should satisfy Republicans. The Libyan Ministry of Defense “rebuffed pleas for help” and “had instructions not to interfere” and that is… a mitigating factor? Are they saying the Libyan government deserves blame instead of Obama? Both governments dealt with it the exact same way, like they had an agreement on this.
theperfecteconomist on January 10, 2013 at 11:57 PM
there was a time that people cared. They cared about the Iranian hostages. I remember a time where a State Department guy stood up to complain bitterly about State employees having to serve in war zones…like Iraq…and NO, he will not go…truth to power
now, not so much
r keller on January 11, 2013 at 12:16 AM
Because the media decided to basically ignore it because it harms Prince Precious.
Dr. Carlo Lombardi on January 11, 2013 at 12:41 AM
1st 2 posts spot on
cmsinaz on January 11, 2013 at 6:00 AM
Where are those 30+ witnesses who survived the attack? Has the cat got their tongue?
The government is lawless.
petefrt on January 11, 2013 at 6:30 AM
Is not the guy that created the video still in Jail. The Media and the White House said it was because of a video and they would not lie to hid gun running and incompetence. And the media and people in congress would not call anyone who questioned the video reason racist or something if it was not because of the video. They would have evidence to back the video reason up before going in front of the low information voters to tell them it was the video can cause them to win an election. /s
tjexcite on January 11, 2013 at 7:27 AM