Where’s the conservative leadership?
Conservatives love to heap praise on Ronald Reagan, though their mythologizing often masks the hard-fought political battles and compromise that led to his election. Movement conservatives devoted years preparing for that election, preparation that included a conservative cohort in Congress wrecking President Jimmy Carter’s trains and tearing up his rail lines on a daily basis. Their parliamentary warfare was designed for a purpose — every bill defeated was one less law they would have to reverse once Reagan was president.
The difference between 1978-80 and the current warfare is that the earlier generation had a core understanding of what was to come. Reagan and the conservative movement that propelled him had a clear vision of what was needed to revive America, defeat communism and reform government. Reagan was able to articulate that vision in a way that resonated with a majority of the nation not because he had a handful of focus-grouped magic phrases but because his rhetoric conveyed an actual political and cultural vision grounded in a concrete conservative philosophy.
The current Republican “leadership” offers no vision because it is no longer grounded in the conservative tradition. Those leaders’ only vision is further disruption. There is nothing conservative about this. In fact, it smacks more of leftist anarchy. Great conservative thinkers like Friedrich A. Hayek, for example, were championed by Reagan and Margaret Thatcher precisely because they sought to create order out of chaos.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
It hasn’t been elected yet.
Hell, it probably hasn’t finished high school yet.
CurtZHP on January 10, 2013 at 5:24 PM
Damn good question.
Obama runs wild and the GOP is mum.
Charlemagne on January 10, 2013 at 5:28 PM
Interregnum, or circling the drain. Take your pick.
OldEnglish on January 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM
Forget Hayek, first of all he wasn’t conservative and you need stronger stuff…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_Spengler
ninjapirate on January 10, 2013 at 5:34 PM
It took a job at the Heritage Foundation…
Seven Percent Solution on January 10, 2013 at 5:34 PM
cowering, clinging to their vestiges of power.
Jeddite on January 10, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Buried at the Ronald Reagan Library
portlandon on January 10, 2013 at 5:37 PM
Faulkner and Riehl conflate ‘establishment’ with ‘conservative’. Establishment Republicans are certainly out of altitude, ideas and airspeed AND detesticate, but they’re not the whole story.
PersonFromPorlock on January 10, 2013 at 5:38 PM
Where’s the conservative leadership?
Talkin’ at a Tea Party last night.
Fallon on January 10, 2013 at 5:38 PM
“Starve the Beast” with its indiscriminate approval of tax-cuts isnt good enough anymore as our guiding policy paradigm. We ended up with a huge chunk of the population being off the federal income tax roll and free to vote themselves whatever goodies they want. Spending is a bigger problem than taxation right now and Republicans must adjust their tax policies accordingly. But I also dont see any politician advocating this on the national level. Lack of leadership indeed.
Valkyriepundit on January 10, 2013 at 5:40 PM
The conservatives are in the Tea Party. The leadership hates them. Therefore: no conservative leadership. The leadership hated Reagan too.
29Victor on January 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM
Wasilla.
(Hehe).
cs89 on January 10, 2013 at 5:53 PM