Libyan gun-control policy left guards unarmed at Benghazi consulate
“Our long term security plan in Libya was to recruit and deploy an armed, locally hired Libyan bodyguard unit,” State Department Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in written testimony.
“However, because of Libyan political sensitivities, armed private security companies were not allowed to operate in Libya,” Nordstrom said in his testimony submitted on Oct. 10. “Therefore, our existing, uniformed static local guard force, both in Tripoli and Benghazi were unarmed, similar to our static local guard forces at many posts around the world. Their job was to observe, report, and alert armed host nation security, and armed DS agents on-site.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Libyan gun-control policy, or Liberal gun-control policy?
Browncoatone on January 10, 2013 at 4:43 PM
Actually obozo issued an executive order demanding that the consulate be unarmed.
Flange on January 10, 2013 at 4:44 PM
One and the same, pretty likely.
CurtZHP on January 10, 2013 at 4:48 PM
Sometimes we as a nation are so really stupid.
Next we’ll go to war but be told we cannot fire until fired upon.
/
CW on January 10, 2013 at 4:50 PM
Didn’t they know to tackle while the baddies reloaded?
rogerb on January 10, 2013 at 4:51 PM
No doubt. It takes about 15 minutes to reload…you know just about enough time for a police officer to arrive at a scene to save one’s arse.
CW on January 10, 2013 at 4:55 PM
- Aliens 1986
apostic on January 10, 2013 at 4:55 PM
So, yet another mass shooting in a gun-free zone?
What say you, nathor?
GWB on January 10, 2013 at 5:11 PM
See! Gun control really does work. Those guards didn’t kill a single one of those, uhh, protesters.
MikeA on January 10, 2013 at 5:27 PM
I think you misspelled “Obama’s.”
Washington Nearsider on January 10, 2013 at 5:51 PM
We don’t pay attention to Britain’s policies at our embassies, why would we here?
Lonetown on January 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM
sexypedophilian will find a way to defend this.
Chuck Schick on January 10, 2013 at 6:35 PM
Took them a while to come up with this excuse, didn’t it?
tom on January 10, 2013 at 6:45 PM
So, what do you think would happen if the Secret Service were told they were not allowed to be armed because of a host country’s gun policies? Does anyone think Obama would be fine with that?
tom on January 10, 2013 at 6:47 PM