“He must have been a real pain in the ass to deal with, because no one seems to personally like him”
On the other side of the aisle, top Senate aides have shrugged when asked which lawmakers might help their old colleague through the confirmation process — an unsurprising reaction considering that a number of Republicans have come out against him already, citing his stances toward Israel (too tough) and Iran (too lax), among other complaints.
A top staffer to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, asked which members of his conference might stand up for Hagel, answered, “Actually don’t know.”
Another top Senate Republican official surmised: “He must have been a real pain in the ass to deal with, because no one seems to personally like him.”…
But some Republicans wonder if Hagel will get a single affirmative vote from Republican senators on the Armed Services Committee, which will weigh his nomination. Already, three Republicans on the panel have said they will oppose him: Mississippi’s Roger Wicker, Louisiana’s David Vitter, and Texas’ Ted Cruz. Two other leading Republicans on the committee, John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, have been highly critical of the nominee.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
FIFY
gatorboy on January 9, 2013 at 4:24 PM
“Highly critical” from those two? Did they say Hagel dressed funny? That’s about the most critical thing I could see coming from those two RINOs.
ButterflyDragon on January 9, 2013 at 4:25 PM
McCain could be the fulcrum. If that’s the right word.
Paul-Cincy on January 9, 2013 at 4:28 PM
Weird. Same goes for Obama.
CW on January 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM
Of COURSE, they’ll oppose him. No downside to doing so. Hagel has FEW advocates that the GOP would worry about. Very little political ‘cost’ involved.
Actually reforming entitlements to save this country from fiscal disaster; that’s a different matter.
michaelo on January 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM
When I saw the headlines, I could have sworn they were talking about bho! It would really be nice to hear what both sides say and feel about bho? Bet there isn’t a bunch of love going on there?
L
letget on January 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM
I think you’ve got the heart of it.
Pqlyur1 on January 9, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Or maybe they just changed their minds because they get another (daily) opportunity to say No to Obama, par for the course.
lester on January 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM
Another bull’s eye for Barky!
Keep it up, champ. All your picks are winners.
UltimateBob on January 9, 2013 at 4:57 PM
So turnabout is not fair play then. Got it. Thanks.
stvnscott on January 9, 2013 at 5:18 PM
Obama has been awful at appointing people. Even you have to concede that.
Chuck Schick on January 9, 2013 at 5:58 PM
Hagel never learned the lesson of being careful on whom one steps on the way up the ladder. Ruthless ambition and “flexible standards” do have consequences.
onlineanalyst on January 9, 2013 at 6:33 PM