D.C. prosecutor now weighing whether to charge David Gregory over magazine
In an e-mail, a spokeswoman for D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier said her department has “completed the investigation into this matter, and the case has been presented to the OAG for a determination of the prosecutorial merit of the case.”
Possessing a magazine capable of holding 10 or more rounds of ammunition, even if empty, is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and a $1,000 fine.
The question of how to proceed now rests with the office of Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan, which oversees prosecutions of some low-level offenses. A spokesman for Nathan said the office would not comment until a decision was made.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Make the enemy live up to their own standards
MoreLiberty on January 9, 2013 at 10:34 AM
What’s to decide, there are people all over America rotting in prison after being convicted for crimes with far less evidence than is available in this case.
Video. Seems clear to me. Charge now and send to trial.
Bishop on January 9, 2013 at 10:35 AM
They won’t touch David
Prosecution for thee but not for me
Hypocrite
cmsinaz on January 9, 2013 at 10:35 AM
This type of reckless disregard for the law shows the need to require permits before conducting “journalism”.
MechanicalBill on January 9, 2013 at 10:37 AM
He’ll plead it..pay $1000 and move on.
Otherwise, if he decides to fight it, he’d potentially overturn his whole basis for bias.
I don’t think the law is right and it does need to be overturned. But to ask an alleged journalist these days to take a stand on Constitutional principles…naw, they won’t.
Unless it is to call 30 round magazines racist or something.
ProfShadow on January 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM
+1
David Gregory should be treated just like any of the hoi polloi.
Of course this whole incident reveals that we don’t have equality before the law – we have a media class and political class which push for laws that they won’t be held to.
gwelf on January 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM
do eeeeeet!
bannor on January 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM
Which magazine? Playboy or Penthouse?
tommy71 on January 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM
If they do proceed, he’ll get a $1000 fine hand slap and that’ll be that.
My understanding is that in most cases of first time offenses, specifically if there is no real prior record on the defendant (regular traffic violations won’t count) judges won’t enforce jail time or they’ll greatly reduce it. So, if the law said three years, they might make it one and if one, then none.
I know someone who got slapped with a couple of misdemeanor charges in NY several years ago*. First time offense, no prior record. According to the law the person could have sat in jail for at least a few months if not a year on top of a several thousand dollar fine.
The individual saw no jail time outside of the brief time he spent in lock-up after the arrest.
* The back story is that he lost his temper in the wrong time and place with the wrong people in trying to prevent public officials from doing their job. In his “escape”, the police claimed he tried to hit them and EMTs with his vehicle whereupon he led them on a “chase” to his home where he was arrested.
Logus on January 9, 2013 at 10:43 AM
I’d prefer they do that, even it’s mostly symbolic. You cannot have a class of people totally exempt from the law. The offense isn’t that bad, so the $1K fine would be sufficient to send a message. Gregory won’t pull a stunt like this again.
Doomberg on January 9, 2013 at 10:46 AM
NBC lawyers will have Gregory pay the fine – and we won’t hear another peep about it.
It would be foolish for him to challenge it – since it would only serve as an opportunity for all to see how many f’d up gun laws there are.
No, this will be taken care of very quietly.
Shhhhhhh.
Hill60 on January 9, 2013 at 10:48 AM
30 round “banana clips” are extremely dangerous!!!!! David Gregory should be locked up in a jail cell for years just for holding one in his hand!!!!!111!!!1!!! eleventy!111!!!!1!!!!111
Seriously, I hope they nail him to a wall just so he sees how absurd it is to call for a ban such a object.
UltimateBob on January 9, 2013 at 10:48 AM
I just thank God that nobody died when Gregory waved that magazine around.
NotCoach on January 9, 2013 at 10:50 AM
He needs to be prosecuted. I’m sure he’ll just be slapped with a fine, but they have to understand how ridiculous it’ll look if those screaming loudest for more laws aren’t held accountable when they blatantly break ones already on the books.
changer1701 on January 9, 2013 at 10:55 AM
The law doesn’t care about that with us plebs, it shouldn’t care with Gregory. Time people in the bubble experience the laws they advocate as the rest of us do.
MechanicalBill on January 9, 2013 at 10:56 AM
LOL
How quaint.
ButterflyDragon on January 9, 2013 at 10:57 AM
Agreed. But I think pointing out the stupidity of a law is also allowed, isn’t it?
NotCoach on January 9, 2013 at 10:58 AM
What would the charge be and would he lose his right to possess a firearm?
Dusty on January 9, 2013 at 10:58 AM
Looking fwd to gunshows where they refer to a discount on a large magazine as a “David Gregory Special.” Certainly not the kinda fame he’d care for. Heh.
apostic on January 9, 2013 at 10:59 AM
One thing I’d like to see is that, since this would be considered a firearms violation, he should be put into the background check system and barred from ever owning or possessing any firearm in the future. Then a second offense would be a more serious crime and require jail time. Maybe even put him on a one year suspended sentence so that if he violates the terms of that he would go strain to jail to serve the sentence.
All this could go far to illustrate the absurdity of some of these laws.
MikeA on January 9, 2013 at 11:01 AM
I think the law requires he attend magazine management courses where he will be allowed to handled 2 round magazines. Once he has demonstrated proficiency in handling 2 round magazines he will be allowed to wave around 6 round magazines at parties and social events while under court appointed supervision.
NotCoach on January 9, 2013 at 11:03 AM
Certainly.
MechanicalBill on January 9, 2013 at 11:03 AM
You are correct.
Even an arrest would remain in his record and make it a little tougher for him to get permits.
dogsoldier on January 9, 2013 at 11:05 AM
[NotCoach on January 9, 2013 at 11:03 AM]
LOL.
Dusty on January 9, 2013 at 11:07 AM
I still think that if Gregory isn’t prosecuted, then there ought to be a Million Journalist Waving 30 Round Magazine March held at the National Mall.
Dusty on January 9, 2013 at 11:11 AM
Is he also now weighing whether to go back to court and ask for the conviction/plea/sentence of former Army Spc. Adam Meckler be overturned/stricken/dismissed?
Resist We Much on January 9, 2013 at 11:22 AM
Resist We Much on January 9, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Don’t know if I care for the Spartacus vibe I’m getting off that. “I’m a journalist.” “No, I’m a journalist!” And they could use these masks too.
apostic on January 9, 2013 at 11:25 AM
Glad to know if I did what Gregory did that the prosecutor would be in the same connundrum.
/s
roy_batty on January 9, 2013 at 12:00 PM
And as I’ve pointed out elsewhere, Heller’s holding that the licensing of a constitutionally-guaranteed right is constitutional means that a license to practice journalism would be fine. It could even be subject to police approval before being issued, and to being revoked.
PersonFromPorlock on January 9, 2013 at 12:49 PM