The real reason Hagel was picked
As the federal government becomes a health care state, there will have to be a generation of defense cuts that overwhelm anything in recent history. Keep in mind how brutal the budget pressure is going to be. According to the Government Accountability Office, if we act on entitlements today, we will still have to cut federal spending by 32 percent and raise taxes by 46 percent over the next 75 years to meet current obligations. If we postpone action for another decade, then we have to cut all non-interest federal spending by 37 percent and raise all taxes by 54 percent.
As this sort of crunch gradually tightens, Medicare will be the last to go. Spending on things like Head Start, scientific research and defense will go quicker. These spending cuts will transform America’s stature in the world, making us look a lot more like Europe today. This is why Adm. Mike Mullen called the national debt the country’s biggest security threat.
Chuck Hagel has been nominated to supervise the beginning of this generation-long process of defense cutbacks. If a Democratic president is going to slash defense, he probably wants a Republican at the Pentagon to give him political cover, and he probably wants a decorated war hero to boot.
All the charges about Hagel’s views on Israel or Iran are secondary.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Lip Gloss actually has a valid theory here, I’m shocked.
Boy howdy are the libs going to be shocked when the Army tells them that terrorists will no longer be targeted with expensive precision munitions, instead the entire village will be leveled with a far cheaper artillery barrage.
Bishop on January 8, 2013 at 12:13 PM
Thanks, Captain Obvious. I thought Obama was just trying to be bipartisan (in a way that also would have a bipartisan backlash) before I read this article.
/sarc
Timin203 on January 8, 2013 at 12:14 PM
The crease in his pants?
NoFanofLibs on January 8, 2013 at 12:17 PM
All based on 2% growth rate of GDP, which is the real result of leftist policies. Just a small dose of regulatory restraint, tax reduction, and spending restraint, and we could be at % growth and good times.
Fat chance with the current government, and the fools who continue to elect them.
peski on January 8, 2013 at 12:19 PM
…or more.
peski on January 8, 2013 at 12:19 PM
I love the tone Brooks consistently takes.
This is inevitable. It’s actually quite devastating to the country, but I live on the fifth moon of Jupiter so it doesn’t effect me. I simply observe.
A-Hole. Too afraid to state what he actually believes, which is how Barry is tube-shooting the future into the abyss.
budfox on January 8, 2013 at 12:21 PM
It’s all related. Hagel doesn’t believe in “peace through strength”.
Paul-Cincy on January 8, 2013 at 12:23 PM
Hagel has long been a very vocal critic of the U.S. military and of strong national security, so yes, he is the perfect pick to oversee the gutting of our defense budget and military.
Pork-Chop on January 8, 2013 at 12:29 PM
We actually need to spend more money on defense. China is building aircraft carriers, Iran is building the bomb, North Korea could hit the US West coast with long-range missiles. Putin is giving us the finger.
The things we SHOULD cut:
1) NPR
2) PBS
3) FDA
4) Department of Education
5) Department of Energy
6) Green energy subsidies like Solyndra
7) Social Security
8) Food Stamps
9) Medicare
10) Medicaid
11) Welfare
nazo311 on January 8, 2013 at 12:37 PM
Well, duh. Who didn’t understand that the ONLY reason Obama picked a Republican for defense is so that he could hide behind a Republican who was “responsible” for gutting the military? As always with this scumbag, it’s all about the finger pointing.
Warner Todd Huston on January 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM
Fixed that for you.
Fenris on January 8, 2013 at 12:42 PM
They also need to make a significant push to economic growth. They need to grow revenue and reduce program spending through economic growth and not just by managing tax rates.
crosspatch on January 8, 2013 at 12:42 PM
1. Because Obamas is an US-hating azzhole.
Indeed nazo311.
All Kids Left Behind…because Obama ‘loves’ them so.
Schadenfreude on January 8, 2013 at 12:43 PM
I don’t get it. If that’s what he wants, why is he nominating Hagel?
besser tot als rot on January 8, 2013 at 12:52 PM
I think Brooks has a point. We are becoming Europe. I hope everyone enjoys really high taxes and crappy health care!
terryannonline on January 8, 2013 at 1:04 PM
The Chuck Hagel of op-eds on Chuck Hagel.
Red Cloud on January 8, 2013 at 1:20 PM
“Decorated War Hero”? Brooks once again proves he’s clueless on anything outside his cocktail party world.
major dad on January 8, 2013 at 1:32 PM
Sort of like how a liberal rag would love to have a nominal “conservative” on its editorial pages to give it cover?
GWB on January 8, 2013 at 1:56 PM
You left out Planned Parenthood, which now receives 45% of its income from the government.
stvnscott on January 8, 2013 at 2:01 PM