<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rick Perry&#8217;s second chance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:09:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cptacek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2241108</link>
		<dc:creator>cptacek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 22:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2241108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;So, he’s either a drug-addled fool or just a fool.&lt;blockquote&gt;
Perhaps he was drug addled when he was on pain medication he was put on by his doctor.  I&#039;m glad I wasn&#039;t in the national spotlight after my last surgery.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Romney was my guy. He lost and turned out to be a wuss of a loser. Letting his sons whine on his behalf in public was shameful. His post-election antics and abandonment of the partly responsible for the deep-divide.

That being said, I’d take the educated, accomplished Romney over treestump-dumb Perry every day of the week. The man is on on record quasi-favoring s&amp;cession. That makes him an un-American quitter in my book. That goes for the rest of you lunkheads talking the same crap around here.

Swalker and other brain-dead moronss talking about lynching people are his constituency. Join those losers if you want. I choose America and will never support those who stand against Her.

Capitalist Hog on January 8, 2013 at 12:51 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://factcheck.org/2011/08/what-perry-really-said-about-secession/

Even factcheck laughs at your silliness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, he’s either a drug-addled fool or just a fool.<br />
<blockquote>
Perhaps he was drug addled when he was on pain medication he was put on by his doctor.  I&#8217;m glad I wasn&#8217;t in the national spotlight after my last surgery.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Romney was my guy. He lost and turned out to be a wuss of a loser. Letting his sons whine on his behalf in public was shameful. His post-election antics and abandonment of the partly responsible for the deep-divide.</p>
<p>That being said, I’d take the educated, accomplished Romney over treestump-dumb Perry every day of the week. The man is on on record quasi-favoring s&amp;cession. That makes him an un-American quitter in my book. That goes for the rest of you lunkheads talking the same crap around here.</p>
<p>Swalker and other brain-dead moronss talking about lynching people are his constituency. Join those losers if you want. I choose America and will never support those who stand against Her.</p>
<p>Capitalist Hog on January 8, 2013 at 12:51 PM</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://factcheck.org/2011/08/what-perry-really-said-about-secession/" rel="nofollow">http://factcheck.org/2011/08/what-perry-really-said-about-secession/</a></p>
<p>Even factcheck laughs at your silliness.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capitalist Hog</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240842</link>
		<dc:creator>Capitalist Hog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;One bad debate after surgery while on pain medication shouldn’t derail someone with so much leadership and experience.

cptacek on January 8, 2013 at 12:32 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, he&#039;s either a drug-addled fool or just a fool. 

Romney was my guy. He lost and turned out to be a wuss of a loser. Letting his sons whine on his behalf in public was shameful. His post-election antics and abandonment of the partly responsible for the deep-divide.

That being said, I&#039;d take the educated, accomplished Romney over treestump-dumb Perry every day of the week. The man is on on record quasi-favoring s&amp;cession. That makes him an un-American quitter in my book. That goes for the rest of you lunkheads talking the same crap around here.

Swalker and other brain-dead moronss talking about lynching people are his constituency. Join those losers if you want. I choose America  and will never support those who stand against Her.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>One bad debate after surgery while on pain medication shouldn’t derail someone with so much leadership and experience.</p>
<p>cptacek on January 8, 2013 at 12:32 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>So, he&#8217;s either a drug-addled fool or just a fool. </p>
<p>Romney was my guy. He lost and turned out to be a wuss of a loser. Letting his sons whine on his behalf in public was shameful. His post-election antics and abandonment of the partly responsible for the deep-divide.</p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;d take the educated, accomplished Romney over treestump-dumb Perry every day of the week. The man is on on record quasi-favoring s&amp;cession. That makes him an un-American quitter in my book. That goes for the rest of you lunkheads talking the same crap around here.</p>
<p>Swalker and other brain-dead moronss talking about lynching people are his constituency. Join those losers if you want. I choose America  and will never support those who stand against Her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illinidiva</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240835</link>
		<dc:creator>Illinidiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;At the end of the day, the GOP WILL go for retreads. Thats plain fact. However good you’re doing ain’t gonna win you the nomination. Try in ’16, and if the your guy/gal loses, you’ll have a better chance in ’20.

tommy71 on January 8, 2013 at 12:41 PM 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ummm..  So you actually want the Republicans to lose in a landslide, which is what will happen with Santorum.  Are you a Democratic troll?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>At the end of the day, the GOP WILL go for retreads. Thats plain fact. However good you’re doing ain’t gonna win you the nomination. Try in ’16, and if the your guy/gal loses, you’ll have a better chance in ’20.</p>
<p>tommy71 on January 8, 2013 at 12:41 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ummm..  So you actually want the Republicans to lose in a landslide, which is what will happen with Santorum.  Are you a Democratic troll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy71</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240823</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the end of the day, the GOP WILL go for retreads. Thats plain fact. However good you&#039;re doing ain&#039;t gonna win you the nomination. Try in &#039;16, and if the your guy/gal loses, you&#039;ll have a better chance in &#039;20.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day, the GOP WILL go for retreads. Thats plain fact. However good you&#8217;re doing ain&#8217;t gonna win you the nomination. Try in &#8217;16, and if the your guy/gal loses, you&#8217;ll have a better chance in &#8217;20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cptacek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240811</link>
		<dc:creator>cptacek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The best way for republicans to run for president is to not run for president during the next two years. The best way to run for president is to actually Function, Achieve something, Save something, Preserve something, Show wisdom, Make good choices, Help us out of this hole. If you do, then come with your hat in your hand. Rand Paul is absolutely annoying this week looking like he is running for president. Successful actions will speak louder than trips to Iowa, let’s see who does something for America in the next two years.

Fleuries on January 8, 2013 at 9:51 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes, I agree with this.  Do your job and do it well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The best way for republicans to run for president is to not run for president during the next two years. The best way to run for president is to actually Function, Achieve something, Save something, Preserve something, Show wisdom, Make good choices, Help us out of this hole. If you do, then come with your hat in your hand. Rand Paul is absolutely annoying this week looking like he is running for president. Successful actions will speak louder than trips to Iowa, let’s see who does something for America in the next two years.</p>
<p>Fleuries on January 8, 2013 at 9:51 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, I agree with this.  Do your job and do it well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cptacek</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240806</link>
		<dc:creator>cptacek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perry was my guy in 2012.  He will still be my guy in 2016 if he decides to run.  

One bad debate after surgery while on pain medication shouldn&#039;t derail someone with so much leadership and experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perry was my guy in 2012.  He will still be my guy in 2016 if he decides to run.  </p>
<p>One bad debate after surgery while on pain medication shouldn&#8217;t derail someone with so much leadership and experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy71</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240799</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol, do you want me to be explicit? Jindal, Palin, Ryan, Rubio and whatever rising stars ain&#039;t gonna win the &#039;16 nomination. It&#039;ll be someone who ran in &#039;12. Jeez, sometimes, being the practical and pragmatic is more difficult than just hoping. Lol. Santorum, anybody?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, do you want me to be explicit? Jindal, Palin, Ryan, Rubio and whatever rising stars ain&#8217;t gonna win the &#8217;16 nomination. It&#8217;ll be someone who ran in &#8217;12. Jeez, sometimes, being the practical and pragmatic is more difficult than just hoping. Lol. Santorum, anybody?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CorporatePiggy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240786</link>
		<dc:creator>CorporatePiggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Perry has effectively become Dan Quayle. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or so the media would have you believe. 

By most measures he has been a highly effective and successful governor. Yes the TransTexas highway was a fantastically bad idea but a) most non Texans never heard of it and b) he did eventually drop it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Perry has effectively become Dan Quayle. </p></blockquote>
<p>Or so the media would have you believe. </p>
<p>By most measures he has been a highly effective and successful governor. Yes the TransTexas highway was a fantastically bad idea but a) most non Texans never heard of it and b) he did eventually drop it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illinidiva</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240763</link>
		<dc:creator>Illinidiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No.. See coherent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.. See coherent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddrintn</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/08/rick-perrys-second-chance/comment-page-2/#comment-2240756</link>
		<dc:creator>ddrintn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236765#comment-2240756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;No, snookums. It’s called “being human”. But of course come 2016 you’ll be out there banging the drum for whatever glib GOPe-approved talking-points machine is out there.

ddrintn on January 8, 2013 at 11:30 AM

No that was a potatoe moment (See Quayle, Dan). 

Illinidiva on January 8, 2013 at 11:44 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, you&#039;re following MSM memes in deciding who&#039;s &quot;electable&quot;? (See jellyfish, spineless.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No, snookums. It’s called “being human”. But of course come 2016 you’ll be out there banging the drum for whatever glib GOPe-approved talking-points machine is out there.</p>
<p>ddrintn on January 8, 2013 at 11:30 AM</p>
<p>No that was a potatoe moment (See Quayle, Dan). </p>
<p>Illinidiva on January 8, 2013 at 11:44 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>So, you&#8217;re following MSM memes in deciding who&#8217;s &#8220;electable&#8221;? (See jellyfish, spineless.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>