Does the debt-limit fight seem played out? It is
But holding up a debt-ceiling increase over spending is a bad idea, the Obama administration says, echoing a similar argument made by President Kennedy’s Treasury secretary 50 years ago, as The Economist’s Greg Ip pointed out in a Tuesday morning tweet.
In 1963, Treasury Secretary Douglas Dillon delivered a speech at a University of Connecticut awards luncheon—reproduced in the pages of the New York Federal Reserve’s monthly review—that argued that no fiscal-policy issue was “in need of more light and less heat as the debt limit.” And his arguments are strikingly familiar.
“[L]et no one labor under the delusion that the debt ceiling is either a sane or an effective instrument for the control of federal expenditures,” he said.
Hitting the ceiling would force the government to delay paying its bills, Dillon argued. It’s an idea central to one modern plan to avert a debt default, but it comes with economic consequences, he said.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
What spending obligations? The Congress is required to pass a budget each year. Until it does, it has no spending obligation obligations, none at all. We haven’t had any spending obligations for 4 years. If the Federal Government had to submit to an audit like private companies do, all the politicians would be in jail.
Pass a budget, then we’ll have spending obligations for this year.
Fenris on January 9, 2013 at 3:17 AM
C Douglas Dillon would have been appalled at the level of debt we are carrying…
JohnGalt23 on January 9, 2013 at 3:36 AM
We are living well beyond our means, no foreseeable method of increasing our income and we want to raise our spending without cuttting one dime from our budget. Only people in Washington would think this makes sense.
Panther on January 9, 2013 at 7:20 AM