Hey, plenty of gun owners support gun control, you know
News flash: most gun owners support common-sense gun-safety laws. I should know; I’m one of them. I own so many shotguns and rifles it’s a veritable arsenal. I used to hunt with my father and grandfather as a boy, and now I love taking my sons hunting with their grandfather and uncle. When I hear the words “gun culture,” the first image that comes to mind is not a crazed loner. I think of cold, crisp mornings riding a horse out into a Georgia field, feeling the thrill as an English Pointer snaps to attention at the scent of a bird. Or long hours sitting in a Texas deer stand with one of my sons, waiting, wondering if a big buck will arrive before the dying of the light. I taught each of my boys about the birds and the bees in a deer stand. Taught them how to respect God’s creation, honor the wild things we harvest, and thank the Creator humbly for our place in the food chain and the ultimate free-range, organic meal…
My gun culture emphasizes tolerance. As a pro-Obama, pro-gay-rights progressive whose boys share the same political views, we are frequently in the field with ultra-conservative Republicans—and yet we hunt together, swap lies around a campfire, and depart with mutual respect. I ask the same of folks who do not appreciate gun culture. I know lots of liberals who would never pass judgment on someone’s sexual habits or faith choices or cultural preferences but who sneer at the thought of armed, ignorant rednecks tromping through the woods to murder Bambi. The left should not turn common-sense gun safety into a gratuitous attack on a culture they don’t understand.
As strongly as I support gun safety—a term I prefer to “gun control” since it is both more accurate and less threatening—restricting access to guns alone will not solve the problem. Which is why President Obama was wise to charge Vice President Joe Biden with looking at the entire toxic, tragic stew that allows mass killings to occur—not just guns, but also the inadequacies of our mental-health system and the celebration of killing in our culture. The media could do its part as well: given the evidence that some mass killers seek fame, would it be so hard for journalists to refuse to publish the names or images of mass murderers going forward?









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No Paul I’m not with you
cw10036 on January 7, 2013 at 7:43 PM
Two hands.
El_Terrible on January 7, 2013 at 7:43 PM
ESAD
Mirimichi on January 7, 2013 at 7:44 PM
The absolute last assmonkey on earth that could speak for gun owners and “common sense” destruction of the Constitution.
fourbten on January 7, 2013 at 7:45 PM
Paul Begala does not equal common sense anything…
d1carter on January 7, 2013 at 7:46 PM
Which is why your opinion is suspect in this matter Mr. Forehead
Rio Linda Refugee on January 7, 2013 at 7:49 PM
The Great Gazoo says what?
Stu Gotts on January 7, 2013 at 7:52 PM
First they came for the machine guns… But I did nothing to stop them, because I have none.
Then they came for the assault rifles… But I did nothing to stop then, because I have none.
Then they came for the semi-auto pistols… But I did nothing to stop them, because I have a revolver.
Then they came for my revolver, and no one was there to protect me, as they were all disarmed.
astonerii on January 7, 2013 at 7:55 PM
I sincerely doubt his hunting stories…with this a** clowns history of making sh*t up and lying profusely to get leftists elected I find it hard to believe he’s a hunter of anything except maybe someone else’s wife….
Tim Zank on January 7, 2013 at 7:55 PM
Why is this article about hunting? The 2nd Amendment had NOTHING to do with hunting.
ButterflyDragon on January 7, 2013 at 7:58 PM
Ah, so what do you think about running guns to Mexican drug cartels?
Bishop on January 7, 2013 at 8:02 PM
There is too much stupidity in this article to do it any justice with a response.
Dusty on January 7, 2013 at 8:04 PM
Sure, I’m for gun control. If you can’t control your gun, you can’t hit your target.
rbj on January 7, 2013 at 8:05 PM
Exhibit A for the cluelessness of the author. There is no loophole for gun shows, the laws there are the same laws as everywhere else.
An uninformed opinion by a gun owner is still an uninformed opinion.
Socratease on January 7, 2013 at 8:08 PM
Gun control and gay rights in the same paragraph? WHY?
vityas on January 7, 2013 at 8:09 PM
Hey, me neither.
I think of a mass of men who decided they had had enough of a tyrant and chose to make a stand, Lexington Green it was called…or something like that.
Bishop on January 7, 2013 at 8:09 PM
For gun control? Don’t. Buy. One.
Isn’t that the same lesson I’m given constantly on abortion and gay marriage?
Firefly_76 on January 7, 2013 at 8:12 PM
‘Some of my best friends are
Negroesgun owners.’PersonFromPorlock on January 7, 2013 at 8:12 PM
Why do we need “assault weapons”? Because government has them, and the Second Amendment is designed to protect our ability to defend our liberty against government.
And by the way, government is not looking all that liberty-loving nowadays.
petefrt on January 7, 2013 at 8:15 PM
Dictionary definition of a “Fudd” is he not?
Firefly_76 on January 7, 2013 at 8:15 PM
Winner winner chicken dinner!
Rio Linda Refugee on January 7, 2013 at 8:19 PM
You could change that line to “Plenty of prior gun owners once supported gun control.”
Reminds me of the white farmers in Zimbabwe that tried to appease Mugabe by siding with him and defending the farm grabs…. hoping they’d be eaten last. Well, they were eaten….last. But they were eaten.
JellyToast on January 7, 2013 at 8:19 PM
He mentions the support of perversion more than once, yet not a word on self-defense?
OldEnglish on January 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM
Of course the logical extension of that argument is that the government has tanks too. Should the people have tanks?
The answer is yes, if it comes to that. Just ask the Czechoslovakians, the Yugoslavians, the Germans, the East Germans, the Georgians, the Iranians. On and on.
Hopefully it won’t come to that. But don’t let them burn any bridges, in any time but especially in these ugly times.
I have a friend who came here from Yugoslavia to escape Communism. Until the last few years, he was a flaming liberal. Now he says it breaks his heart to see where this country is headed. He says it’s becoming the place he spent half his life trying to escape.
petefrt on January 7, 2013 at 8:38 PM
Ya know,
He misses the point of the Second Amendment…but I guess that’s his aim.
ProfShadow on January 7, 2013 at 8:42 PM
I thought there was some law about registering people who engaged in such behavior.
Lost in Jersey on January 7, 2013 at 8:45 PM
Yes, you’re right. That’s their aim. They’re attempting to marginalize 2A into some kind of hunting and/or self-defense amendment, when it’s not that at all. Our advocates need to reject this characterization of the 2A fearlessly, loud and clear, and educate everyone who will listen what 2A is all about.
It’s not about hunting. It’s not about self-defense. It’s about liberty.
Why must we be so easily sucked into leftist small-ball, when it’s the biggie, our freedom, that’s at stake. Romney let it happen to him, thus to us. He got sucked into small-ball, and never was individual liberty, free markets and limited government defended. Yet still we’re oozing down the same spineless path.
We are losing this war for the soul of our country, with only one side fighting.
petefrt on January 7, 2013 at 8:59 PM
Begala is full of crap, therefore anything that comes out of him is composed of the same.
Siddhartha Vicious on January 7, 2013 at 9:00 PM
He’s right. They’re called “Senate and House Democrats,” and contrary to popular belief, their opinions don’t count!!
Glenn Jericho on January 7, 2013 at 9:30 PM
The gun owners to which he refers are obviously liberal elitists like himself, who believe in two sets of rules – one for them, and one for everyone else.
CurtZHP on January 7, 2013 at 9:38 PM
I will agree that fully automatic machine guns are not a good idea and that is gun control.
To my knowledge however they are the only assault weapons around and they are never used. Semi automatics with a similar stock is still the same as any other semi automatic. If it trips your trigger to pay $1,500 for a military stock go for it. You have the right to own it and enjoy it. If is scares people that don’t know any better they can learn. Not your problem.
CW20 on January 7, 2013 at 9:39 PM
There is a current photo of the Aurora nitwit, James Holmes, at the AOL homepage. He has changed his “look” to resemble a Guy Fawkes mask.
Everybody’s a star.
onlineanalyst on January 7, 2013 at 9:40 PM
We already have “gun control”, Begala, you dope. Thousands of laws around the country, controlling and limiting citizens’ access to guns and ammunition.
Why do gun rights supporters fail to point this out, and cede the languagge to the gun grabbers?
Jaibones on January 7, 2013 at 9:45 PM
meme alert: “Gun safety” is the new “framing” they’re trying out.
These guys are so transparent. We’ve read their playbook.
juliesa on January 7, 2013 at 10:25 PM
Worth repeating a Thousand times.
Where is ‘Hunting’ even mentioned in the 2A?
Galt2009 on January 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM
Let’s just blunt about it this is Serf Control.
Galt2009 on January 8, 2013 at 12:42 PM