Are grand bargains still possible?
* Of the 234 House Republicans elected on Nov. 6, 2012, just 39 — or 16.6 percent — were reelected with 55 percent of the vote or less, the traditional benchmark for vulnerability in future general elections. Of that same group, only 15 of the 234 — 6 percent — represent districts that Obama won in the 2012 election. (Ninety-six percent of Democrats represent districts Obama won.) Those numbers make a clear political case that the only danger for most GOP members of the House is in a primary, not a general election. And, the best way to avoid a primary is to hold the ideological line on any and everything. Compromise with Democrats is the quickest and best way to shorten a career. The best example of that new political reality? The fact that Boehner couldn’t even get his plan that would have raised taxes on those making $1 million and more to the floor of the House late last year.
* Polarization in the country is at an all-time high. In Pew polling conducted since 1987 that tests Democrats and Republicans on four dozen values questions, there is an 18-point gap in how the two sides respond — the largest ever measured. That includes a 41 percent difference in how Democrats and Republicans view the “social safety net” (it was a 23-point margin in 1987) and a 39 percent chasm on the environment. The vast majority of the increased polarization has come in the past decade — during the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama. According to the Pew study: “Both parties have become smaller and more ideologically homogeneous…[the] values gap between Republicans and Democrats is now greater than gender, age, race or class divides.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No.
The democrat party is completely radicalized these days and may be to the LEFT of most 20th Century socialist parties and Obama is a spoiled petulant child who has never been spanked.
Bargains with that are IMPOSSIBLE. Weepy Boner only proved himself a fool by trying.
wildcat72 on January 7, 2013 at 6:41 PM
Man, I hope not.
BKeyser on January 7, 2013 at 6:43 PM
Yeah, “Grand Bargains” these days involve RINO establishment leadership porking conservatives up the gazoo without the courtesy of using lube.
The reason why we gave the GOP the House wasn’t to negotiate with or agree with Obama. We elected them to OPPOSE him.
wildcat72 on January 7, 2013 at 6:53 PM
Reading the MSM, you’d think that we’ve gotten to this point of spending almost twice what we bring in through partisan bickering and bitterly contest.
The GOP and Dems take turns ratcheting up spending. It’s the grandest bargain of all.
HitNRun on January 7, 2013 at 6:55 PM
I think answering that necessitates the affirmation to the question “Are grand bargains good?” Let get agreement on that first, shall we?
Dusty on January 7, 2013 at 7:07 PM
As long as Obama believes that spending isn’t a problem, I don’t see how there can be any bargains.
supernova on January 7, 2013 at 7:14 PM
Any “bargain” involves bankruptcy and hyperinflation.
Sane people don’t rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic, after all.
Rebar on January 7, 2013 at 7:15 PM
The “grand bargain” is low taxes and high spending. How could anyone not like that?
Transpo on January 7, 2013 at 7:48 PM
Not while Obama is in power. The moment democrats are a minority party and a Republican is in the white house, then it will be all about grand bargains.
astonerii on January 7, 2013 at 8:16 PM