Obama sure has been disappointing on fiscal leadership
I expect nothing from the G.O.P. It’s lost and leaderless. I expect a lot from Obama, who knows what needs to be done and has said so in the past. I expect him to stop acting as a party leader and start acting like the president of the whole country. When I heard Obama say, after the election, that this time he was going to take his plan to the country, and not make the mistake again of just negotiating with Congress, I thought, “Great, I can’t wait to hear what he says.” But all he took to the country was a plan for increasing taxes on “millionaires and billionaires.” There was nothing comprehensive, nothing bold, no great journey for America and no risks for him. Really disappointing.
Maybe Obama has a strategy: First raise taxes on the wealthy, which gives him the credibility with his base to then make big spending cuts in the next round of negotiations. Could be. But raising taxes on the wealthy is easy. Now we’re at the hard part: comprehensive tax reform, entitlement cuts, radical cost-saving approaches to health care and new investments in our growth engines. This will require taking things away from people — to both save and invest. A lot of lobbies will fight it. The president will need to rally the center of the country and the business community to overcome them. He’ll have to change the polls, not just read the polls. He will have to take on his own base and the G.O.P.’s.
Obama has spent a lot of time lately bashing the rich to pay their “fair share.” You know what? There are definitely some Wall Street bankers and C.E.O.’s who deserve that bashing. But there are many successful Americans who got their wealth the old-fashioned way — by risk-taking, going into debt to start a business or pursue a dream. It’s time for the president to do some risk-taking — to stop just hammering the wealthy, which is so easy, and to start selling the country on a strategy to multiply them. We need to tax more millionaires, but we also need more millionaires and middle classes to tax. The president was elected to grow our national pie, not just re-divide it.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
You mean marry into it like you did, Tommy?
Blake on January 6, 2013 at 9:19 AM
Where was this crap before the election.
rob verdi on January 6, 2013 at 9:23 AM
Silly Tom, that’s not how Marxism works. Even your beloved Chinese have figured that out. There’s no Social Justice in growing the pie, because you can’t legislate success for everyone. Failure, on the other hand…
trubble on January 6, 2013 at 9:23 AM
Sometimes I think we are living in an alternate universe from people like Friedman and David Ignatius. These clowns are perpetually perplexed by Obama’s refusal of leadership. They still maintain their gauzy Hollywood-filter view of him as a giant among men, a singular leader we are not worthy of. And they keep stamping their tiny feet demanding that he live up to their Olympian expectations.
rockmom on January 6, 2013 at 9:24 AM
Translation: death panels and lots of public pork projects for the labor unions in blue states.
Wethal on January 6, 2013 at 9:24 AM
exactamundo
cmsinaz on January 6, 2013 at 9:25 AM
Well, marrying is old-fashioned, isn’t it?
OldEnglish on January 6, 2013 at 9:26 AM
That is so true! They’re not very bright, are they?
Naturally Curly on January 6, 2013 at 9:35 AM
When the Heck has Dear Liar ever demonstrated leadership?
rbj on January 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM
How cute. Terminally dense Friedman still believes BHO gives a crap about the American economy and actually thinks he would want more successful people (bourgeoisie) in the private sector.
RadClown on January 6, 2013 at 9:40 AM
Obligatory racist quote from the Bible.
Drained Brain on January 6, 2013 at 9:43 AM
This is an Onion piece, right?
visions on January 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM
More likely generated from the “Write your own Tom Friedman op-ed” website.
Wethal on January 6, 2013 at 9:52 AM
So, at the moment, we are not in a climate change?
BL@KBIRD on January 6, 2013 at 10:08 AM
Who are you and what have you done with Tom Friedman?
Odysseus on January 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM
Greedy Friedman must have sat down with his tax adviser.
Got your new bill, eh?
Pay up, beotch.
artist on January 6, 2013 at 10:26 AM
He just lifted this op/ed from the pen of Samuelson.
hungrymongo on January 6, 2013 at 10:36 AM
@blake FTR, I ain’t married.
tommy71 on January 6, 2013 at 10:58 AM
These guys are supposed to be the smart ones? It’s like they have a complete inability to absorb and process new information, particularly information that conflicts with their pe-existing opinions. Maybe I should be happy that after 4 years of exactly the same behavior from Obama, Friedman has started to get ever so small a clue as to who Obama really is.
besser tot als rot on January 6, 2013 at 11:23 AM
Aw, shuddup, Tom!
Resist We Much on January 6, 2013 at 12:02 PM
Low info types are slow to notice. If they notice at all.
Bmore on January 6, 2013 at 12:29 PM
THIS!!! How can these people be so oblivious of the obvious?!!
karenhasfreedom on January 6, 2013 at 12:54 PM