Also, observations indicate there is an inverse relationship to grid lock and number of women that are allowed in the WH’s top meetings.

Oh and don’t trust intuition, or stereotypes about women, on this. Trust the science.

Tomorrow I’ll present the science based modelling results of this data. Hint.

There was lots of “you-go-girl” nodding, as senator after senator extolled the virtues of female cooperation, collaboration, and can-do workmanship. (“Workwomanship?” It’s a word, perhaps, whose time has come.) They agreed that, had women been running the show, there would have been no “fiscal cliff” drama. “We don’t believe in the culture of delay,” said Barbara Mikulski, (D-MD.)

Complete and utter bullsh!t. Democrats are simply a majority of the women’s caucus, so they think that by showing “solidarity” they might be relevant in a GOP-dominated congress. Plus it never hurts to remind the nation how much Republicans hate women, if they lose. Boehner needs to ignore the gender ploy and treat them like all the other legislators.

That said, demeaning men by calling them women is sexist garbage. There is nothing wrong with being female, period.

Would more women in the Senate mean less gridlock?

Odumbass and his brigade of Marxist leeches got everything they wanted. Gridlock would have been nice.