It’s time for liberals to compromise on entitlement reform
Just as Republicans must learn to live with tax increases, Democrats must learn to live with — and vote for — changes in entitlements. They should keep in mind that reforms such as a chained consumer price index, which alters the inflation calculation applied to Social Security, and means testing the benefits of wealthy retirees, do not threaten the social safety net.
Neither Franklin Roosevelt on Social Security nor Lyndon Johnson on Medicare was wedded to any of the particulars of those programs — only the principle of guaranteed support from the government.
The road ahead is paved with compromises that many Democrats won’t like. The president will stick to his refusal to negotiate with Republicans who want to hold an increase in the debt ceiling hostage to spending cuts. But he will have to negotiate over the sequester — the $1.2 trillion in cuts to defense and domestic programs scheduled to take effect in two months…
If liberals are disappointed in Obama’s fiscal-cliff deal, imagine how they will feel in late February when he starts making tough choices on spending cuts. Liberals need to think harder about what their own long-term deficit reduction plan would be. Raising more revenue is necessary. It’s not sufficient.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
LOL
Robert_Paulson on January 5, 2013 at 3:43 PM
They can’t. It’s what holds their fragile coalition together.
thebrokenrattle on January 5, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Moochers would ‘pitchfork’ them.
Schadenfreude on January 5, 2013 at 3:49 PM
Bronco Bama needs to read this piece about his own sense of entitlement. The last several paragraphs are particularly good.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100196479/barack-obamas-7-million-hawaii-vacation-is-an-insult-to-americas-struggling-middle-class/
onlineanalyst on January 5, 2013 at 3:49 PM
52% of Democrats would rather pass on trillions of dollars of debt to their own children and grandchildren than make ANY changes whatsoever to Medicare or Social Security. Half of Democrats also believe that America’s fiscal problems can be solved by just taxing the ‘evil rich.’
Democrats and ‘Sacrifice’
Resist We Much on January 5, 2013 at 3:53 PM
False! It is merely that you cannot accept the reductions that would fix the problem of solvency.
OldEnglish on January 5, 2013 at 3:55 PM
onlineanalyst, he doesn’t give a da*n. “We is overcome, Michelle. I is president“.
Schadenfreude on January 5, 2013 at 3:57 PM
Everyone who calls new taxes “more revenue” should have their head split, spontaneously.
Schadenfreude on January 5, 2013 at 3:58 PM
Up the retirement age by 2 years – EASY
Mean test Social Security and Medicare – EASY
Eliminate the Death Tax – EASY – and morally correct
No one will argue – or will they?
jake-the-goose on January 5, 2013 at 4:00 PM
‘Toon of the Day: Obama’s “Protection” Racket
Resist We Much on January 5, 2013 at 4:03 PM
Maxine Waters is still demanding higher taxes on the “wealthy” because they must give “their fair share.”
onlineanalyst on January 5, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Early in 0bama’s first time, I think someone actually proposed slowly raising the eligibility age for SS and Medicare to 69 by the year 2075. The usual suspects howled and wailed about killing seniors.
JimLennon on January 5, 2013 at 4:05 PM
52% of Democrats will. See link above.
Resist We Much on January 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM
Good one, please add “narcissistic” to the list.
Schadenfreude on January 5, 2013 at 4:16 PM
Schad, done:
Anyone have any others that you want me to add?
Resist We Much on January 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM
You are fantastic. You gave it prominence too
boorish
insipid
hypocritical
Machiavellian
Muenchhausean
Orwellean
Pinnochean
Goebbelsean
Schadenfreude on January 5, 2013 at 4:35 PM
unaccountable
Schadenfreude on January 5, 2013 at 4:37 PM
fragile
Schadenfreude on January 5, 2013 at 4:38 PM
Nope,ya pretty much covered mine!
Tim Zank on January 5, 2013 at 4:54 PM
How about infantile, dishonest, and slavish?
Anti-Control on January 5, 2013 at 5:09 PM
I cannot see Jonathan Alter’s face or read his name without remembering him running down Katie Couric in a parking lot and fawning all over her, ignoring the freaked out look on her face as she tried to get away, shortly after her Sarah Palin interviews aired.
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on January 5, 2013 at 5:57 PM
I say let them keep on spending. Let them burn!
astonerii on January 5, 2013 at 7:11 PM