<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey, let&#8217;s repeal the Second Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogsoldier</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237449</link>
		<dc:creator>dogsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Galt2009 on January 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank you! And there is much more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Galt2009 on January 4, 2013 at 11:01 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Thank you! And there is much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blur Brain</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237378</link>
		<dc:creator>Blur Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;If You&#8217;ve Got The Time, Let&#8217;s Repeal The Second Amendment...&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#8217; a long read but this is how the left views the Constitution. (Vanity Fair) &#8211; Enough. We talk now. And my position is going to be direct: America needs to repeal the Second Amendment. Now, before gunnies run for their weapons and belch o...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If You&#8217;ve Got The Time, Let&#8217;s Repeal The Second Amendment&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217; a long read but this is how the left views the Constitution. (Vanity Fair) &#8211; Enough. We talk now. And my position is going to be direct: America needs to repeal the Second Amendment. Now, before gunnies run for their weapons and belch o&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsherwd65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237271</link>
		<dc:creator>rsherwd65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[single stack on January 4, 2013 at 11:14 AM 

That is the key language in the second ammendment - &quot;Shall not be infringed&quot;.  What don&#039;t people understand about that?  As Ted Nugent once said, &quot;The Second Ammendment is my conceal carry permit&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>single stack on January 4, 2013 at 11:14 AM </p>
<p>That is the key language in the second ammendment &#8211; &#8220;Shall not be infringed&#8221;.  What don&#8217;t people understand about that?  As Ted Nugent once said, &#8220;The Second Ammendment is my conceal carry permit&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWalker</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237262</link>
		<dc:creator>SWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;    Obviously, you’re clueless about the 2nd Amendment. It wasn’t included in the Constitution because of fears regarding British invasion. It was included because of fears of a tyrannic federal government.

    blink on January 4, 2013 at 10:45 AM 

It was put in because the tyrannical British government tried to confiscate arms in the early days of the Revolution.

JeffWeimer on January 4, 2013 at 11:44 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I suggest that you read what the Founding Fathers said about firearms ownership before concluding that that was their sole reason for including the 2nd Amendment. Also, it bares mentioning that the United States Constitution was not ratified until 1788, 10 years after the Revolutionary War was over. The Founding Fathers had plenty of time to think over the implications of a government forcibly disarming it&#039;s own population. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thewildernessofmirrors.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/shall-not-be-infringed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in·fringe // //
v.   in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es

v.   tr.

    To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent.
    Obsolete To defeat; invalidate.

v.   intr.
To encroach on someone or something; engage in trespassing: an increased workload that infringed on his personal life.

[Latin īnfringere, to destroy : in-, intensive pref.; see in-2 + frangere, to break; see bhreg- in Indo-European roots.]
in·fring’er n.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The progressive movement has been eroding this amendment since early on in the 20th century. Hiding their actions behind such vile and detestable terms as reasonable regulations and public safety.

The real truth is that the founding fathers left zero wiggle room regarding the regulation of firearms ownership. They made their thoughts on the subject absolutely crystal clear.

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

Thomas Jefferson: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (1764 Letter and speech from T.
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)

John Adams: “Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self
defense.” (A defense of the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the
people’s liberty teeth (and) keystone… the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable… more than
99% of them [guns] by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very
atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference [crime]. When firearms go, all goes,
we need them every hour.” (Address to 1st session of Congress)

George Mason: “To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them.” (3 Elliot,
Debates at 380)

Noah Webster: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in
almost every country in Europe.” (1787, Pamphlets on the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: “A free people ought to be armed.” (Jan 14 1790, Boston Independent
Chronicle.)

Thomas Jefferson: “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” (T. Jefferson papers,
334, C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)

James Madison: “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of
other countries, whose people are afraid to trust them with arms.” (Federalist Paper #46)

History had to be revised by a progressive controlled educational system for these facts to be so ignored and watered down as to advance the notion the founding fathers found both insane and insulting, reasonable regulation and public safety.

Thomas Jefferson perhaps said it best.

Thomas Jefferson: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (1764 Letter and speech from T.
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)

The second amendment is not a States Rights issue, nor does the Federal Government have any constitutional authority to regulate firearms ownership, the constitution makes this indisputably and incontrovertibly clear.

Yet Federal administration after administration and State after State have completely and totally violated the letter of the law as spelled out in no uncertain terms in the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.

Furthermore, the FBI has documented and for the most part hidden their results which prove beyond any doubt that populated centers where individual gun ownership and right to carry laws exist have the very lowest assault, murder, and robbery levels in the entire country.

Federal and State gun regulations are not and never has been about providing public safety, they are and always have been about making stripping the constitutional rights away from citizens and increasing the governments control over individuals lives.

Ponder the words of the great and famous statesman Benjamin Franklin, consider where you fall in this great divide, are you on the side of the Founding Fathers of this Great Republic, or have you sided with the Progressive Movement, (and yes that really does mean communists) who are attempting to subvert the US Constitution?

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

Choose you this day upon whose side you are on, I pray that the words of Sameul Adams are not spoken of you.
Sameul Adams:“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>    Obviously, you’re clueless about the 2nd Amendment. It wasn’t included in the Constitution because of fears regarding British invasion. It was included because of fears of a tyrannic federal government.</p>
<p>    blink on January 4, 2013 at 10:45 AM </p>
<p>It was put in because the tyrannical British government tried to confiscate arms in the early days of the Revolution.</p>
<p>JeffWeimer on January 4, 2013 at 11:44 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>I suggest that you read what the Founding Fathers said about firearms ownership before concluding that that was their sole reason for including the 2nd Amendment. Also, it bares mentioning that the United States Constitution was not ratified until 1788, 10 years after the Revolutionary War was over. The Founding Fathers had plenty of time to think over the implications of a government forcibly disarming it&#8217;s own population. </p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://thewildernessofmirrors.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/shall-not-be-infringed/" rel="nofollow">in·fringe // //<br />
v.   in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es</p>
<p>v.   tr.</p>
<p>    To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent.<br />
    Obsolete To defeat; invalidate.</p>
<p>v.   intr.<br />
To encroach on someone or something; engage in trespassing: an increased workload that infringed on his personal life.</p>
<p>[Latin īnfringere, to destroy : in-, intensive pref.; see in-2 + frangere, to break; see bhreg- in Indo-European roots.]<br />
in·fring’er n.</p>
<p>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</p>
<p>The progressive movement has been eroding this amendment since early on in the 20th century. Hiding their actions behind such vile and detestable terms as reasonable regulations and public safety.</p>
<p>The real truth is that the founding fathers left zero wiggle room regarding the regulation of firearms ownership. They made their thoughts on the subject absolutely crystal clear.</p>
<p>Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary<br />
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to<br />
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)</p>
<p>Thomas Jefferson: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither<br />
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and<br />
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man<br />
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (1764 Letter and speech from T.<br />
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)</p>
<p>John Adams: “Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self<br />
defense.” (A defense of the Constitution of the US)</p>
<p>George Washington: “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the<br />
people’s liberty teeth (and) keystone… the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable… more than<br />
99% of them [guns] by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very<br />
atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference [crime]. When firearms go, all goes,<br />
we need them every hour.” (Address to 1st session of Congress)</p>
<p>George Mason: “To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them.” (3 Elliot,<br />
Debates at 380)</p>
<p>Noah Webster: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in<br />
almost every country in Europe.” (1787, Pamphlets on the Constitution of the US)</p>
<p>George Washington: “A free people ought to be armed.” (Jan 14 1790, Boston Independent<br />
Chronicle.)</p>
<p>Thomas Jefferson: “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” (T. Jefferson papers,<br />
334, C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)</p>
<p>James Madison: “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of<br />
other countries, whose people are afraid to trust them with arms.” (Federalist Paper #46)</p>
<p>History had to be revised by a progressive controlled educational system for these facts to be so ignored and watered down as to advance the notion the founding fathers found both insane and insulting, reasonable regulation and public safety.</p>
<p>Thomas Jefferson perhaps said it best.</p>
<p>Thomas Jefferson: “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither<br />
inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and<br />
better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man<br />
may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” (1764 Letter and speech from T.<br />
Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)</p>
<p>The second amendment is not a States Rights issue, nor does the Federal Government have any constitutional authority to regulate firearms ownership, the constitution makes this indisputably and incontrovertibly clear.</p>
<p>Yet Federal administration after administration and State after State have completely and totally violated the letter of the law as spelled out in no uncertain terms in the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the FBI has documented and for the most part hidden their results which prove beyond any doubt that populated centers where individual gun ownership and right to carry laws exist have the very lowest assault, murder, and robbery levels in the entire country.</p>
<p>Federal and State gun regulations are not and never has been about providing public safety, they are and always have been about making stripping the constitutional rights away from citizens and increasing the governments control over individuals lives.</p>
<p>Ponder the words of the great and famous statesman Benjamin Franklin, consider where you fall in this great divide, are you on the side of the Founding Fathers of this Great Republic, or have you sided with the Progressive Movement, (and yes that really does mean communists) who are attempting to subvert the US Constitution?</p>
<p>Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary<br />
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly’s reply to<br />
the Governor of Pennsylvania.)</p>
<p>Choose you this day upon whose side you are on, I pray that the words of Sameul Adams are not spoken of you.<br />
Sameul Adams:“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, — go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!”<br />
</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Gotts</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237253</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Gotts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Again, you must be forced to live by the language of the 2nd or use the described method for amending it. Those are your only options.

Again, you are an idiot.

blink on January 4, 2013 at 10:41 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is a third option: keepthechange and all other similar useful idiots could just move to Cuba.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Again, you must be forced to live by the language of the 2nd or use the described method for amending it. Those are your only options.</p>
<p>Again, you are an idiot.</p>
<p>blink on January 4, 2013 at 10:41 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>There is a third option: keepthechange and all other similar useful idiots could just move to Cuba.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffWeimer</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237236</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffWeimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Obviously, you’re clueless about the 2nd Amendment. It wasn’t included in the Constitution because of fears regarding British invasion. It was included because of fears of a tyrannic federal government.

blink on January 4, 2013 at 10:45 AM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It was put in because the tyrannical British government tried to confiscate arms in the early days of the Revolution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Obviously, you’re clueless about the 2nd Amendment. It wasn’t included in the Constitution because of fears regarding British invasion. It was included because of fears of a tyrannic federal government.</p>
<p>blink on January 4, 2013 at 10:45 AM </p></blockquote>
<p>It was put in because the tyrannical British government tried to confiscate arms in the early days of the Revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moesart</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237221</link>
		<dc:creator>Moesart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s repeal New York City instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s repeal New York City instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitsy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237220</link>
		<dc:creator>bitsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is with the new lefty hard-on for controlling people with &#039;insurance&#039;? Freaking psychos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is with the new lefty hard-on for controlling people with &#8216;insurance&#8217;? Freaking psychos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW20</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237188</link>
		<dc:creator>CW20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The people retain the right to &lt;strong&gt;free speech&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strike&gt;keep and bear arms&lt;/strike&gt;, subject to reasonable restrictions deemed necessary by the Congress and the President to secure the lives and well being of others…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The people retain the right to <strong>free speech</strong> <strike>keep and bear arms</strike>, subject to reasonable restrictions deemed necessary by the Congress and the President to secure the lives and well being of others…</p></blockquote>
<p>You first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galt2009</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/01/04/hey-lets-repeal-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-2237178</link>
		<dc:creator>Galt2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=236074#comment-2237178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Pay attention, because this is actually important. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 precedes the Second Amendment. In other words, (since you really aren’t bright enough to understand this without it being explained to you), it come before any of the Amendments.

What this means, is that the Second Amendment is subject to or falls under the jurisdiction of Article 1 Section 8, Clause 8.

Since quiet honestly, you really just aren’t very bright, I am sure this is still eluding your grasp. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 is generally referred to as “The Copyright” Clause. Placed in the United States Constitution to ensure that America did not remain a intellectually, scientifically or artistically frozen nation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmmm I haven’t thought of this aspect before –&lt;strong&gt; thank you for pointing it out.&lt;/strong&gt;

I would also mention that consider that our founding fathers were learned men of science and intellectual pursuit.  They most assuredly would have been able have looked back at weapons development before their time and could have foreseen that it would proceed in the future – as with every other intellectual endeavor.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Contrary to what useless idiots like you believe,&lt;strong&gt; the 2nd amendment was&lt;em&gt; not&lt;/em&gt; included in the Constitution to facilitate sporting events or hunting.&lt;/strong&gt; It was put there very specifically for the purpose of allowing the citizens of the United States to defend themselves from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And what they meant by domestic was not just the criminal element of society, but more importantly, for the citizens to be able to protect themselves against a government that had overreached the Constitutional limitations that they had intentional placed on that government and had become unresponsive to the Citizens of the United States of America. In other words, to prevent the Government of the United States of America from becoming a tyranny.

SWalker on January 4, 2013 at 11:02 AM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, the 2nd amendment was put in the BOR as restraint on a Feral Government – not as guarantor of a recreation la activity.

Does the word ‘Hunting’ even appear in the Constitution?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pay attention, because this is actually important. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 precedes the Second Amendment. In other words, (since you really aren’t bright enough to understand this without it being explained to you), it come before any of the Amendments.</p>
<p>What this means, is that the Second Amendment is subject to or falls under the jurisdiction of Article 1 Section 8, Clause 8.</p>
<p>Since quiet honestly, you really just aren’t very bright, I am sure this is still eluding your grasp. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 is generally referred to as “The Copyright” Clause. Placed in the United States Constitution to ensure that America did not remain a intellectually, scientifically or artistically frozen nation.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmmm I haven’t thought of this aspect before –<strong> thank you for pointing it out.</strong></p>
<p>I would also mention that consider that our founding fathers were learned men of science and intellectual pursuit.  They most assuredly would have been able have looked back at weapons development before their time and could have foreseen that it would proceed in the future – as with every other intellectual endeavor.</p>
<blockquote><p>Contrary to what useless idiots like you believe,<strong> the 2nd amendment was<em> not</em> included in the Constitution to facilitate sporting events or hunting.</strong> It was put there very specifically for the purpose of allowing the citizens of the United States to defend themselves from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And what they meant by domestic was not just the criminal element of society, but more importantly, for the citizens to be able to protect themselves against a government that had overreached the Constitutional limitations that they had intentional placed on that government and had become unresponsive to the Citizens of the United States of America. In other words, to prevent the Government of the United States of America from becoming a tyranny.</p>
<p>SWalker on January 4, 2013 at 11:02 AM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, the 2nd amendment was put in the BOR as restraint on a Feral Government – not as guarantor of a recreation la activity.</p>
<p>Does the word ‘Hunting’ even appear in the Constitution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>