“Pro-life” and “feminism” aren’t mutually exclusive
Pro-life feminism has captivated a new generation of young women who reject the illusion that to be pro-woman is to be pro-choice. Gallup polling showed that among 18-to-29-year-olds, there was a 5% increase in those labeling themselves “pro-life” between 2007–08 and 2009–10. The past few years have seen the emergence of young leaders like Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life of America, who is responsible for organizing more than 675 pro-life groups on college campuses across the nation, and Lila Rose of Live Action, whose undercover video work has forced the abortion industry to confront and amend practices it cannot defend, as well as dozens of other future leaders who have assisted our organization as staff members and interns. During the past two summers we’ve had young female leaders join the SBA List from Stanford, Georgetown, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and the University of California, Berkeley. These passionate defenders of women and unborn children return to their campuses ready to lead pro-life groups and educate their classmates on the tragedy of abortion.
Not only does this young generation of pro-life women shun the notion that abortion somehow liberates women; it views abortion as the civil- and human-rights cause of our day. Abortion is an injustice that permeates our society. Forty years after Roe v. Wade, we realize that a third of our peers are not here to share our progress and our hopes. It is our loss as well as theirs.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Heresy! /s
Logus on January 3, 2013 at 10:14 PM
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on January 3, 2013 at 10:26 PM
Sarah Palin has done wonders in paving the way in showing this, as have other pro-life advocates including Kelly Ayotte, Nikki Haley, and Susana Martinez. The Susan B. Anthony List has been a strong champion of both life and women as well. These women have both my support and admiration in striving for their noble goal of equal rights for all, and the recognition of the humanity of all people.
Stoic Patriot on January 3, 2013 at 10:32 PM
Depends on how you define “feminism.” The left has been redefining words for a long time now. To them you cannot be pro-life and a feminist because “feminism” is, by definition “pro-abortion.” And that’s about it.
besser tot als rot on January 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM
Meh. I say drop the “feminism” and all of the baggage that comes with it and leave it for the left.
Gingotts on January 3, 2013 at 10:43 PM
If conservatives were in favor of abortion, ‘feminists’ would be against it. In your heart you know I’m right.
Knott Buyinit on January 3, 2013 at 11:34 PM
You would think that feminists should be more pro-life as they ought to be on the side of the woman taking responsibility for her actions. However, feminists in the modern sense are really all about creating a new class of government dependents than they are about fostering female equality. “Don’t worry, little girl, papa guvmint is here to take care of you!” It’s a rather nauseating case of paternalism in action, actually.
I personally am neither pro-life nor pro-choice (I take more of the libertarian stance that I can’t make choices for you regardless of whether I approve of the choice being made or not.) but I just wish that the pro choice crowd would have the intellectual honesty to admit that why yes, they are essentially taking a life.
If it was really about equality, they would treat men and women equal regardless of what set of reproductive equipment you were issued at birth, but instead we’re treated as walking vajayjays.
DangerHighVoltage on January 3, 2013 at 11:35 PM
Radical feminism, like radical Islam, taints the very thing they are trying to achieve and give the entire movement a very bad name. If they want to have any more progress, they need to change their names and adopt a reasonable platform. Equal rights? Sure. Equal pay? No problem. Equal access? Where it makes sense (I’m not sure I want a female reporter in a male locker room right after a game). All sex, even consensual sex between willing partners is ‘rape’? Sorry, you’re an idiot.
RoadRunner on January 3, 2013 at 11:36 PM
What’s the definition of a woman?
A support system for a *unt.
OldEnglish on January 4, 2013 at 12:21 AM
“For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.” Romans 1:25. The loonie leftists deluded themselves long before they pulled the wool over the world. My mother considered herself a prolife conservative feminist long before anyone had ever heard of Sarah Palin. In her view, as a mother who had been single and needed to work, a Christian and a nurse, how could she not? The problem with liberal “feminists” who think that killing the unborn is acceptable is that they think they’re “god”. That problem however crosses many ideological boundaries, but seems to find a home among those “liberally” unhindered by such thinking as standards and absolutes or an ultimate authority and creator.
Logus on January 4, 2013 at 12:49 AM
Be careful ladies, the female equivalent of a misogynist is a feminist.
Thomas More on January 4, 2013 at 7:09 AM
The word you’re looking for is “misandrist,” Thomas.
mis-o-GYN-ist = woman hater
mis-ANDR-ist = man hater
I personally consider myself more of a misanthropist.
mis-ANTHROP-ist = people hater
gryphon202 on January 4, 2013 at 9:26 AM
Too bad Abobo doesn’t have any sons, they’d both make great wives – can only hope my little girls grow up to change the world for the better.
abobo on January 4, 2013 at 10:36 AM