Want to grow the economy? Cut spending
In a paper released this year, economists Carmen M. Reinhart, Vincent R. Reinhart, and Kenneth Rogoff said that periods of “debt overhang” – when accumulated gross debt exceeds 90 percent of a country’s total economic activity for five or more consecutive years – reduce annual economic growth by more than one percentage point for decades.
Over 20 years, the authors write, there can be a “massive cumulative output loss” that reduces gains by 25 percent or more. The U.S. went over the 90 percent threshold after the 2008 financial crisis. At $16.3 trillion, our current gross federal debt represents more than 100 percent of 2012’s total economic activity or gross domestic product…
A little history: 2000 was about the best year ever for federal revenue since 1950. The government raked in slightly more than $2 trillion in nominal dollars and $2.3 trillion in inflation-adjusted (fiscal year 2005) dollars. When measured as a percentage of GDP, revenue reached 20.6 percent, the highest fraction ever recorded in peacetime. Although it’s true that receipts in 2006 and 2007 topped the $2.3 trillion mark in constant 2005 dollars, those totals represent smaller fractions of GDP, 18.2 percent and 18.5 percent, respectively. So it’s fair to call the $2.3 trillion in constant dollars a high-water mark. (All these figures are drawn from the 2013 Historical Tables generated by the OMB; see table 1.3.)
The high level of revenue – both in constant dollars and as a percentage of GDP – was reached in a roaring economy. And all Americans were taxed at significantly higher levels than they are now.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Someone hasn’t been listening to BO.
RickB on January 1, 2013 at 7:32 PM
Not going to happen. Monetary collapse, here we come!
trigon on January 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM
But if we did that our cool president wouldn’t be able to, like, give us as much free stuff.
Drained Brain on January 1, 2013 at 7:36 PM
You can cite all the historical data you want, but you’ll never make lefties understand basic economics.
supernova on January 1, 2013 at 7:37 PM
I have a nephew who reads all kinds of economics “research” and really believes that government does not need to adhere to the same economic rules the rest of us do, that debt for government is okay, and that government spending is the secret to prosperity and employment.
Nothing you post from anyone who does not share this view will convince him. Oh well. Reality will really suck for him.
Mommynator on January 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM
Doesn’t fit the Marxist’s strategic plan.
Math is hard.
davidk on January 1, 2013 at 7:52 PM
If the goal is to humble AmeriKKKa. the current path is perfectly progressive.
profitsbeard on January 1, 2013 at 8:19 PM