The most influential VP ever?
Perhaps the only surprise at all is that, in contrast to a year ago, it took Biden quite this long to become the president’s point man on the latest round of fiscal talks. The exact reason for the delay is not clear. Perhaps it is that, only a week and a half ago, Obama had called on his vice president to lead a commission to expedite recommendations on a truly serious national issue, gun violence (as opposed to the present trumped-up issue, fiscal reform, which requires only the smidgeon of political courage necessary to depart from ideological rigidities). Maybe Obama wanted to keep his veep’s powder dry for that.
Or maybe it is just that, in the awkward pattern of political dance partnerships that have emerged over the last couple of years, whenever Barack Obama and Speaker John Boehner fail to execute – as they did after the “Plan B” debacle — it’s Biden and his old Senate colleague, Mitch McConnell, who step into the spotlight. The Biden-McConnell duo didn’t cut it during last year’s cliffhanger over the debt limit, of course. But in a sign of just how important a figure the vice president has become in Washington, Biden’s absence until now has been one reason that Republicans doubted Obama’s seriousness about cutting a deal, my colleague Chris Frates reported last week.
As the inevitable brinksmanship plays out, it’s useful to step back and look at just how central a role Biden has played throughout Obama’s presidency.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Didn’t even have to read it to know where this was goin’.
davidk on January 1, 2013 at 7:03 PM
Dick Cheney of course. Everyone knows he was really running the show. At least that was the left’s story for eight solid years.
CurtZHP on January 1, 2013 at 7:04 PM
Is this Biden calling in a favor across the party to writers at the NYT to frontrun his 2016 nomination?
I can’t think of what else this could possibly be. I mean, Biden’s the least relevant VP since the split-party tickets.
HitNRun on January 1, 2013 at 7:14 PM
Joe is seeing Hillary sick in hospital and sees his chances in 2016 going up.
albill on January 1, 2013 at 7:15 PM
Which explains a lot when you think about it.
HotAirian on January 1, 2013 at 7:15 PM
Most flatulent VP ever is more like it.
radjah shelduck on January 1, 2013 at 7:18 PM
Doesn’t someone have to actually accomplish something before they can be considered “influential”?
RoadRunner on January 1, 2013 at 7:20 PM
Are these people serious?
ButterflyDragon on January 1, 2013 at 7:28 PM
gun control = “truly serious national issue”
fiscal reform = “trumped-up issue”
Ha. Ha ha. Ha. Ha ha ha.
steebo77 on January 1, 2013 at 7:42 PM
Sheriff Joe, man of influence.
myrenovations on January 1, 2013 at 8:00 PM
If your definition of ‘influential’ is being a stupid ahole, then I agree.
Thomas More on January 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/blog/bruce-feldman/21483316/orange-bowl-rep-
davidk on January 1, 2013 at 8:36 PM
What nonsense. Name anything Biden has ACTUALLY accomplished. Furious activity does NOT equate to meaningful results. A windmill without grinding equipment may still be spinning in the wind, but ultimately does NO work.
Warner Todd Huston on January 1, 2013 at 8:54 PM