Poll: Just 23% satisfied with direction of nation
Americans do see a flicker of light at the end what has been a long tunnel.
Four years ago, just 13% of Americans said they were satisfied with the way things were going in the USA. At the time, financial institutions from big banks to the auto industry were in crisis as the economic contracted and unemployment soared. Now, 23% express satisfaction with the country’s course — still significantly lower than when previous recent presidents took office for their second terms. For Bush in 2005, 45% were satisfied; for Bill Clinton in 1997, 43%; for Ronald Reagan in 1985, 52%.
Memories of the economic travails of the past few years are fresh. Jackson was laid off when her employer decided to contract out customer services; after five weeks the new firm hired her back but with less generous health care coverage and no 401(k) retirement plan. Pierce has watched as the low- and moderate-income families in housing units he manages struggle, “affording less, living on shoe strings, eating ramen” noodles.
In the poll, more than a third say either they or one of their closest family members have suffered a “major financial setback” in the past year; just one in five report a major financial gain in their family. While the economy, in fact, is growing again — the recession officially ended in June 2009 — just a third of Americans see it that way. They’re outnumbered by the 44% who say it’s in a recession or a depression.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I’m so excited to be granted the opportunity to work so others dont have to!
Jeddite on January 2, 2013 at 12:01 AM
The problem with the libs’ plan to spend, spend, and monetize:
The Monopoly money is meant to buy real assets: cell phones, airtime on cellular networks, food, fuel, rent….Inflation happens because an asset has real value. When a devalued currency seeks to pay for an asset, it’s going to take more currency as the currency is now worth less.
The government is not issuing food stamps per se anymore–it’s an allotment of a certain amount of US$ on an EBT card. As the dollar devalues, that allotment will pay for less and less food. Nokia or whoever is going to want a certain value for their phones. As what the US government can pay them shrinks, that maintenance contract will become lower and lower in priority. As the value being paid by a Section 8 voucher to a landlord shrinks, maintenance will become an even lower priority.
Let’s see how enthusiastically 0bamaphone Lady is when her phone is held together with duct tape, her EBT can only buy bread and peanut butter, and there’s crap all over her bathroom floor.
Sekhmet on January 2, 2013 at 12:41 AM
The great paradox of Politics: 9% of people approve of Congress’s actions, yet incumbents gets re-elected at a 90%+ rate.
People hate their congresspeople, but they’re even more afraid of change.
Good Solid B-Plus on January 2, 2013 at 1:01 AM
It’s that high?
Warner Todd Huston on January 2, 2013 at 1:52 AM
Actually they think its the other congresspeople that’s the problem, their own congressperson is doing a fine job.
Gianni on January 2, 2013 at 4:58 AM
rogerb on January 2, 2013 at 7:08 AM
23% satisfied with circling the drain?
they must think it is like an amusement park ride…..
ted c on January 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM
I have a section 8 voucher and it’s worse than you describe. My local housing authority board just voted to lower the amount of subsidy they provide for a one bedroom unit. I questioned whether HUD put out a new schedule for payment rates. The answer was no, we just decided to lower it for the coming year. I questioned why only the 1 bedrooms were getting nailed – no answer. But I already know the answer – its a war on older people who are the vast majority of holders of one bedroom vouchers. We as a group have the least ability to handle financial adversity so obviously we are the easieist target so housing authorities can continue to pay high salaries with golden perks.
BTW, have you priced peanut butter lately. It’s practically a luxury nowadays.
platypus on January 2, 2013 at 8:05 AM
Yet they voted for this POS.
Don’t feel sorry for those people. Feel sorry for those of us who knew what was coming and have to pay for their mistakes.
gophergirl on January 2, 2013 at 8:31 AM
I don’t believe this poll.
moonsbreath on January 2, 2013 at 9:30 AM
Seniors as a group have the most money and net worth, and yet receive the most govt benefits.
Seven Seas on January 2, 2013 at 12:11 PM